Many hyperlinks are disabled.
Use anonymous login
to enable hyperlinks.
Parents and children of check-in [e68b427a]
|
2014-03-20
| ||
| 14:56 | Previous check-in is not quite correct. "x IN (?)" is not exactly the same as "x==?" do to collation and affinity issues. The correct converstion should be to "x==(+? COLLATE binary)". The current check-in fixes this problem and provides test cases. Ticket [e39d032577df69] (check-in: 2ff3b25f user: drh tags: trunk) | |
| 13:26 | Convert expressions of the form "X IN (?)" with exactly one value on the RHS of the IN into equality tests: "X=?". Add test cases to verify that statements work correctly on this corner case. Fix for ticket [e39d032577df6942]. (check-in: e68b427a user: drh tags: trunk) | |
| 12:17 | Fix an unnecessarily obtuse use of a bitmask flag. (check-in: ca314081 user: drh tags: trunk) | |