** This module contains C code that generates VDBE code used to process
** the WHERE clause of SQL statements.  This module is reponsible for
** generating the code that loops through a table looking for applicable
** rows.  Indices are selected and used to speed the search when doing
** so is applicable.  Because this module is responsible for selecting
** indices, you might also think of this module as the "query optimizer".
**
** $Id: where.c,v 1.237 2007/02/06 13:26:33 drh Exp $
*/
#include "sqliteInt.h"

/*
** The number of bits in a Bitmask.  "BMS" means "BitMask Size".
*/
#define BMS  (sizeof(Bitmask)*8)
................................................................................
** a join, then transfer the appropriate markings over to derived.
*/
static void transferJoinMarkings(Expr *pDerived, Expr *pBase){
  pDerived->flags |= pBase->flags & EP_FromJoin;
  pDerived->iRightJoinTable = pBase->iRightJoinTable;
}
























































































/*
** The input to this routine is an WhereTerm structure with only the
** "pExpr" field filled in.  The job of this routine is to analyze the
** subexpression and populate all the other fields of the WhereTerm
** structure.
**
................................................................................
    WhereClause sOr;
    WhereTerm *pOrTerm;

    assert( (pTerm->flags & TERM_DYNAMIC)==0 );
    whereClauseInit(&sOr, pWC->pParse, pMaskSet);
    whereSplit(&sOr, pExpr, TK_OR);
    exprAnalyzeAll(pSrc, &sOr);
    assert( sOr.nTerm>0 );
    j = 0;
    do{

      iColumn = sOr.a[j].leftColumn;
      iCursor = sOr.a[j].leftCursor;
      ok = iCursor>=0;
      for(i=sOr.nTerm-1, pOrTerm=sOr.a; i>=0 && ok; i--, pOrTerm++){
        if( pOrTerm->eOperator!=WO_EQ ){
          goto or_not_possible;
        }
        if( pOrTerm->leftCursor==iCursor && pOrTerm->leftColumn==iColumn ){
          pOrTerm->flags |= TERM_OR_OK;
        }else if( (pOrTerm->flags & TERM_COPIED)!=0 ||
                    ((pOrTerm->flags & TERM_VIRTUAL)!=0 &&
                     (sOr.a[pOrTerm->iParent].flags & TERM_OR_OK)!=0) ){
          pOrTerm->flags &= ~TERM_OR_OK;
        }else{
          ok = 0;
        }
      }
    }while( !ok && (sOr.a[j++].flags & TERM_COPIED)!=0 && j<sOr.nTerm );
    if( ok ){
      ExprList *pList = 0;
      Expr *pNew, *pDup;
      Expr *pLeft = 0;
      for(i=sOr.nTerm-1, pOrTerm=sOr.a; i>=0 && ok; i--, pOrTerm++){
        if( (pOrTerm->flags & TERM_OR_OK)==0 ) continue;
        pDup = sqlite3ExprDup(pOrTerm->pExpr->pRight);

** This module contains C code that generates VDBE code used to process
** the WHERE clause of SQL statements.  This module is reponsible for
** generating the code that loops through a table looking for applicable
** rows.  Indices are selected and used to speed the search when doing
** so is applicable.  Because this module is responsible for selecting
** indices, you might also think of this module as the "query optimizer".
**
** $Id: where.c,v 1.238 2007/02/23 23:13:34 drh Exp $
*/
#include "sqliteInt.h"

/*
** The number of bits in a Bitmask.  "BMS" means "BitMask Size".
*/
#define BMS  (sizeof(Bitmask)*8)
................................................................................
** a join, then transfer the appropriate markings over to derived.
*/
static void transferJoinMarkings(Expr *pDerived, Expr *pBase){
  pDerived->flags |= pBase->flags & EP_FromJoin;
  pDerived->iRightJoinTable = pBase->iRightJoinTable;
}

#if !defined(SQLITE_OMIT_OR_OPTIMIZATION) && !defined(SQLITE_OMIT_SUBQUERY)
/*
** Return TRUE if the given term of an OR clause can be converted
** into an IN clause.  The iCursor and iColumn define the left-hand
** side of the IN clause.
**
** The context is that we have multiple OR-connected equality terms
** like this:
**
**           a=<expr1> OR  a=<expr2> OR b=<expr3>  OR ...
**
** The pOrTerm input to this routine corresponds to a single term of
** this OR clause.  In order for the term to be a condidate for
** conversion to an IN operator, the following must be true:
**
**     *  The left-hand side of the term must be the column which
**        is identified by iCursor and iColumn.
**
**     *  If the right-hand side is also a column, then the affinities
**        of both right and left sides must be such that no type
**        conversions are required on the right.  (Ticket #2249)
**
** If both of these conditions are true, then return true.  Otherwise
** return false.
*/
static int orTermIsOptCandidate(WhereTerm *pOrTerm, int iCursor, int iColumn){
  int affLeft, affRight;
  assert( pOrTerm->eOperator==WO_EQ );
  if( pOrTerm->leftCursor!=iCursor ){
    return 0;
  }
  if( pOrTerm->leftColumn!=iColumn ){
    return 0;
  }
  affRight = sqlite3ExprAffinity(pOrTerm->pExpr->pRight);
  if( affRight==0 ){
    return 1;
  }
  affLeft = sqlite3ExprAffinity(pOrTerm->pExpr->pLeft);
  if( affRight!=affLeft ){
    return 0;
  }
  return 1;
}

/*
** Return true if the given term of an OR clause can be ignored during
** a check to make sure all OR terms are candidates for optimization.
** In other words, return true if a call to the orTermIsOptCandidate()
** above returned false but it is not necessary to disqualify the
** optimization.
**
** Suppose the original OR phrase was this:
**
**           a=4  OR  a=11  OR  a=b
**
** During analysis, the third term gets flipped around and duplicate
** so that we are left with this:
**
**           a=4  OR  a=11  OR  a=b  OR  b=a
**
** Since the last two terms are duplicates, only one of them
** has to qualify in order for the whole phrase to qualify.  When
** this routine is called, we know that pOrTerm did not qualify.
** This routine merely checks to see if pOrTerm has a duplicate that
** might qualify.  If there is a duplicate that has not yet been
** disqualified, then return true.  If there are no duplicates, or
** the duplicate has also been disqualifed, return false.
*/
static int orTermHasOkDuplicate(WhereClause *pOr, WhereTerm *pOrTerm){
  if( pOrTerm->flags & TERM_COPIED ){
    /* This is the original term.  The duplicate is to the left had
    ** has not yet been analyzed and thus has not yet been disqualified. */
    return 1;
  }
  if( (pOrTerm->flags & TERM_VIRTUAL)!=0
     && (pOr->a[pOrTerm->iParent].flags & TERM_OR_OK)!=0 ){
    /* This is a duplicate term.  The original qualified so this one
    ** does not have to. */
    return 1;
  }
  /* This is either a singleton term or else it is a duplicate for
  ** which the original did not qualify.  Either way we are done for. */
  return 0;
}
#endif /* !SQLITE_OMIT_OR_OPTIMIZATION && !SQLITE_OMIT_SUBQUERY */

/*
** The input to this routine is an WhereTerm structure with only the
** "pExpr" field filled in.  The job of this routine is to analyze the
** subexpression and populate all the other fields of the WhereTerm
** structure.
**
................................................................................
    WhereClause sOr;
    WhereTerm *pOrTerm;

    assert( (pTerm->flags & TERM_DYNAMIC)==0 );
    whereClauseInit(&sOr, pWC->pParse, pMaskSet);
    whereSplit(&sOr, pExpr, TK_OR);
    exprAnalyzeAll(pSrc, &sOr);
    assert( sOr.nTerm>=2 );
    j = 0;
    do{
      assert( j<sOr.nTerm );
      iColumn = sOr.a[j].leftColumn;
      iCursor = sOr.a[j].leftCursor;
      ok = iCursor>=0;
      for(i=sOr.nTerm-1, pOrTerm=sOr.a; i>=0 && ok; i--, pOrTerm++){
        if( pOrTerm->eOperator!=WO_EQ ){
          goto or_not_possible;
        }
        if( orTermIsOptCandidate(pOrTerm, iCursor, iColumn) ){
          pOrTerm->flags |= TERM_OR_OK;
        }else if( orTermHasOkDuplicate(&sOr, pOrTerm) ){


          pOrTerm->flags &= ~TERM_OR_OK;
        }else{
          ok = 0;
        }
      }
    }while( !ok && (sOr.a[j++].flags & TERM_COPIED)!=0 && j<2 );
    if( ok ){
      ExprList *pList = 0;
      Expr *pNew, *pDup;
      Expr *pLeft = 0;
      for(i=sOr.nTerm-1, pOrTerm=sOr.a; i>=0 && ok; i--, pOrTerm++){
        if( (pOrTerm->flags & TERM_OR_OK)==0 ) continue;
        pDup = sqlite3ExprDup(pOrTerm->pExpr->pRight);

#    May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
#
#***********************************************************************
# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library.  The
# focus of this file is testing the use of indices in WHERE clauses
# based on recent changes to the optimizer.
#
# $Id: where2.test,v 1.10 2006/11/06 15:10:06 drh Exp $

set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
source $testdir/tester.tcl

# Build some test data
#
do_test where2-1.0 {
................................................................................
  } {99 6 10000 10006 sort t1 i1w}
}

# Verify that OR clauses get translated into IN operators.
#
set ::idx {}
ifcapable subquery {set ::idx i1w}
do_test where2-6.1 {
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE w=99 OR w=100 ORDER BY +w





  }
} [list 99 6 10000 10006 100 6 10201 10207 sort t1 $::idx]
do_test where2-6.2 {
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE w=99 OR w=100 OR 6=w ORDER BY +w
  }
} [list 6 2 49 51 99 6 10000 10006 100 6 10201 10207 sort t1 $::idx]
................................................................................
do_test where2-6.6 {
  queryplan {
    SELECT b.* FROM t1 a, t1 b
     WHERE a.w=1 AND (b.z=10 OR a.y=b.z OR b.z=10)
     ORDER BY +b.w
  }
} [list 1 0 4 4 2 1 9 10 sort a i1w b $::idx]

























































































































# Unique queries (queries that are guaranteed to return only a single
# row of result) do not call the sorter.  But all tables must give
# a unique result.  If any one table in the join does not give a unique
# result then sorting is necessary.
#
do_test where2-7.1 {

#    May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
#
#***********************************************************************
# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library.  The
# focus of this file is testing the use of indices in WHERE clauses
# based on recent changes to the optimizer.
#
# $Id: where2.test,v 1.11 2007/02/23 23:13:34 drh Exp $

set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
source $testdir/tester.tcl

# Build some test data
#
do_test where2-1.0 {
................................................................................
  } {99 6 10000 10006 sort t1 i1w}
}

# Verify that OR clauses get translated into IN operators.
#
set ::idx {}
ifcapable subquery {set ::idx i1w}
do_test where2-6.1.1 {
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE w=99 OR w=100 ORDER BY +w
  }
} [list 99 6 10000 10006 100 6 10201 10207 sort t1 $::idx]
do_test where2-6.1.2 {
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE 99=w OR 100=w ORDER BY +w
  }
} [list 99 6 10000 10006 100 6 10201 10207 sort t1 $::idx]
do_test where2-6.2 {
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE w=99 OR w=100 OR 6=w ORDER BY +w
  }
} [list 6 2 49 51 99 6 10000 10006 100 6 10201 10207 sort t1 $::idx]
................................................................................
do_test where2-6.6 {
  queryplan {
    SELECT b.* FROM t1 a, t1 b
     WHERE a.w=1 AND (b.z=10 OR a.y=b.z OR b.z=10)
     ORDER BY +b.w
  }
} [list 1 0 4 4 2 1 9 10 sort a i1w b $::idx]

# Ticket #2249.  Make sure the OR optimization is not attempted if
# comparisons between columns of different affinities are needed.
#
do_test where2-6.7 {
  execsql {
    CREATE TABLE t2249a(a TEXT UNIQUE);
    CREATE TABLE t2249b(b INTEGER);
    INSERT INTO t2249a VALUES('0123');
    INSERT INTO t2249b VALUES(123);
  }
  queryplan {
    -- Because a is type TEXT and b is type INTEGER, both a and b
    -- will attempt to convert to NUMERIC before the comparison.
    -- They will thus compare equal.
    --
    SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE a=b;
  }
} {123 0123 nosort t2249b {} t2249a {}}
do_test where2-6.9 {
  queryplan {
    -- The + operator removes affinity from the rhs.  No conversions
    -- occur and the comparison is false.  The result is an empty set.
    --
    SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE a=+b;
  }
} {nosort t2249b {} {} sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
do_test where2-6.9.2 {
  # The same thing but with the expression flipped around.
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE +b=a
  }
} {nosort t2249b {} {} sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
do_test where2-6.10 {
  queryplan {
    -- Use + on both sides of the comparison to disable indices
    -- completely.  Make sure we get the same result.
    --
    SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE +a=+b;
  }
} {nosort t2249b {} t2249a {}}
do_test where2-6.11 {
  # This will not attempt the OR optimization because of the a=b
  # comparison.
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE a=b OR a='hello';
  }
} {123 0123 nosort t2249b {} t2249a {}}
do_test where2-6.11.2 {
  # Permutations of the expression terms.
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE b=a OR a='hello';
  }
} {123 0123 nosort t2249b {} t2249a {}}
do_test where2-6.11.3 {
  # Permutations of the expression terms.
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE 'hello'=a OR b=a;
  }
} {123 0123 nosort t2249b {} t2249a {}}
do_test where2-6.11.4 {
  # Permutations of the expression terms.
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE a='hello' OR b=a;
  }
} {123 0123 nosort t2249b {} t2249a {}}
do_test where2-6.12 {
  # In this case, the +b disables the affinity conflict and allows
  # the OR optimization to be used again.  The result is now an empty
  # set, the same as in where2-6.9.
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE a=+b OR a='hello';
  }
} {nosort t2249b {} {} sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
do_test where2-6.12.2 {
  # In this case, the +b disables the affinity conflict and allows
  # the OR optimization to be used again.  The result is now an empty
  # set, the same as in where2-6.9.
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE a='hello' OR +b=a;
  }
} {nosort t2249b {} {} sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
do_test where2-6.12.3 {
  # In this case, the +b disables the affinity conflict and allows
  # the OR optimization to be used again.  The result is now an empty
  # set, the same as in where2-6.9.
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE +b=a OR a='hello';
  }
} {nosort t2249b {} {} sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
do_test where2-6.13 {
  # The addition of +a on the second term disabled the OR optimization.
  # But we should still get the same empty-set result as in where2-6.9.
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE a=+b OR +a='hello';
  }
} {nosort t2249b {} t2249a {}}

# Variations on the order of terms in a WHERE clause in order
# to make sure the OR optimizer can recognize them all.
do_test where2-6.20 {
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t2249a x CROSS JOIN t2249a y WHERE x.a=y.a
  }
} {0123 0123 nosort x {} {} sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
do_test where2-6.21 {
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t2249a x CROSS JOIN t2249a y WHERE x.a=y.a OR y.a='hello'
  }
} {0123 0123 nosort x {} {} sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
do_test where2-6.22 {
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t2249a x CROSS JOIN t2249a y WHERE y.a=x.a OR y.a='hello'
  }
} {0123 0123 nosort x {} {} sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
do_test where2-6.23 {
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t2249a x CROSS JOIN t2249a y WHERE y.a='hello' OR x.a=y.a
  }
} {0123 0123 nosort x {} {} sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}

# Unique queries (queries that are guaranteed to return only a single
# row of result) do not call the sorter.  But all tables must give
# a unique result.  If any one table in the join does not give a unique
# result then sorting is necessary.
#
do_test where2-7.1 {