return exprNodeIsConstant(pWalker, pExpr);
}

/*
** Walk the expression tree passed as the first argument. Return non-zero
** if the expression consists entirely of constants or copies of terms 
** in pGroupBy that sort with the BINARY collation sequence.














*/
int sqlite3ExprIsConstantOrGroupBy(Parse *pParse, Expr *p, ExprList *pGroupBy){
  Walker w;
  memset(&w, 0, sizeof(w));
  w.eCode = 1;
  w.xExprCallback = exprNodeIsConstantOrGroupBy;
  w.u.pGroupBy = pGroupBy;

  return exprNodeIsConstant(pWalker, pExpr);
}

/*
** Walk the expression tree passed as the first argument. Return non-zero
** if the expression consists entirely of constants or copies of terms 
** in pGroupBy that sort with the BINARY collation sequence.
**
** This routine is used to determine if a term of the HAVING clause can
** be promoted into the WHERE clause.  In order for such a promotion to work,
** the value of the HAVING clause term must be the same for all members of
** a "group".  The requirement that the GROUP BY term must be BINARY
** assumes that no other collating sequence will have a finer-grained
** grouping than binary.  In other words (A=B COLLATE binary) implies
** A=B in every other collating sequence.  The requirement that the
** GROUP BY be BINARY is stricter than necessary.  It would also work
** to promote HAVING clauses that use the same alternative collating
** sequence as the GROUP BY term, but that is much harder to check,
** alternative collating sequences are uncommon, and this is only an
** optimization, so we take the easy way out and simply require the
** GROUP BY to use the BINARY collating sequence.
*/
int sqlite3ExprIsConstantOrGroupBy(Parse *pParse, Expr *p, ExprList *pGroupBy){
  Walker w;
  memset(&w, 0, sizeof(w));
  w.eCode = 1;
  w.xExprCallback = exprNodeIsConstantOrGroupBy;
  w.u.pGroupBy = pGroupBy;