**
**   (2)  The subquery is not an aggregate or (2a) the outer query is not a join
**        and (2b) the outer query does not use subqueries other than the one
**        FROM-clause subquery that is a candidate for flattening.  (2b is
**        due to ticket [2f7170d73bf9abf80] from 2015-02-09.)
**
**   (3)  The subquery is not the right operand of a LEFT JOIN
**        or the subquery is not itself a join.

**
**   (4)  The subquery is not DISTINCT.
**
**  (**)  At one point restrictions (4) and (5) defined a subset of DISTINCT
**        sub-queries that were excluded from this optimization. Restriction 
**        (4) has since been expanded to exclude all DISTINCT subqueries.
**
................................................................................
  **         t1 LEFT OUTER JOIN (t2 JOIN t3)
  **
  ** If we flatten the above, we would get
  **
  **         (t1 LEFT OUTER JOIN t2) JOIN t3
  **
  ** which is not at all the same thing.





  **
  ** See also tickets #306, #350, and #3300.
  */
  if( (pSubitem->fg.jointype & JT_OUTER)!=0 ){
    isLeftJoin = 1;
    if( pSubSrc->nSrc>1 ){
      return 0; /* Restriction (3) */
    }
  }

  /* Restriction 17: If the sub-query is a compound SELECT, then it must
  ** use only the UNION ALL operator. And none of the simple select queries
  ** that make up the compound SELECT are allowed to be aggregate or distinct

**
**   (2)  The subquery is not an aggregate or (2a) the outer query is not a join
**        and (2b) the outer query does not use subqueries other than the one
**        FROM-clause subquery that is a candidate for flattening.  (2b is
**        due to ticket [2f7170d73bf9abf80] from 2015-02-09.)
**
**   (3)  The subquery is not the right operand of a LEFT JOIN
**        or the subquery is not itself a join and the outer query is not
**        an aggregate.
**
**   (4)  The subquery is not DISTINCT.
**
**  (**)  At one point restrictions (4) and (5) defined a subset of DISTINCT
**        sub-queries that were excluded from this optimization. Restriction 
**        (4) has since been expanded to exclude all DISTINCT subqueries.
**
................................................................................
  **         t1 LEFT OUTER JOIN (t2 JOIN t3)
  **
  ** If we flatten the above, we would get
  **
  **         (t1 LEFT OUTER JOIN t2) JOIN t3
  **
  ** which is not at all the same thing.
  **
  ** If the subquery is the right operand of a LEFT JOIN, then the outer
  ** query cannot be an aggregate.  This is an artifact of the way aggregates
  ** are processed - there is not mechanism to determine if the LEFT JOIN
  ** table should be all-NULL.
  **
  ** See also tickets #306, #350, and #3300.
  */
  if( (pSubitem->fg.jointype & JT_OUTER)!=0 ){
    isLeftJoin = 1;
    if( pSubSrc->nSrc>1 || isAgg ){
      return 0; /* Restriction (3) */
    }
  }

  /* Restriction 17: If the sub-query is a compound SELECT, then it must
  ** use only the UNION ALL operator. And none of the simple select queries
  ** that make up the compound SELECT are allowed to be aggregate or distinct

    JOIN (SELECT * FROM (SELECT 9)) AS z;
} {1 1 1 9}
do_execsql_test join-14.3 {
  SELECT *
  FROM (SELECT 111)
  LEFT JOIN (SELECT cc+222, * FROM (SELECT * FROM (SELECT 333 cc)));
} {111 555 333}












finish_test

    JOIN (SELECT * FROM (SELECT 9)) AS z;
} {1 1 1 9}
do_execsql_test join-14.3 {
  SELECT *
  FROM (SELECT 111)
  LEFT JOIN (SELECT cc+222, * FROM (SELECT * FROM (SELECT 333 cc)));
} {111 555 333}

do_execsql_test join-14.4 {
  DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1;
  CREATE TABLE t1(c PRIMARY KEY, a TEXT(10000), b TEXT(10000));
  SELECT * FROM (SELECT 111) LEFT JOIN (SELECT c+222 FROM t1) GROUP BY 1;
} {111 {}}
do_execsql_test join-14.5 {
  DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1;
  CREATE TABLE t1(c PRIMARY KEY) WITHOUT ROWID;
  SELECT * FROM (SELECT 111) LEFT JOIN (SELECT c+222 FROM t1) GROUP BY 1;
} {111 {}}

finish_test