# EVIDENCE-OF: R-37879-39987 sqlite> EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
# SELECT a FROM t1 UNION SELECT c FROM t2;
# 1|0|0|SCAN TABLE t1
# 2|0|0|SCAN TABLE t2
# 0|0|0|COMPOUND SUBQUERIES 1 AND 2 USING TEMP B-TREE (UNION)
#
det 5.12 "SELECT a FROM t1 UNION SELECT c FROM t2" {
  1 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 USING COVERING INDEX i2}
  2 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t2 USING COVERING INDEX i4}
  0 0 0 {COMPOUND SUBQUERIES 1 AND 2 USING TEMP B-TREE (UNION)}
}

# EVIDENCE-OF: R-44864-63011 sqlite> EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
# SELECT a FROM t1 EXCEPT SELECT d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1;
# 1|0|0|SCAN TABLE t1 USING COVERING INDEX i2
# 2|0|0|SCAN TABLE t2 2|0|0|USE TEMP B-TREE FOR ORDER BY
# 0|0|0|COMPOUND SUBQUERIES 1 AND 2 (EXCEPT)
#
det 5.13 "SELECT a FROM t1 EXCEPT SELECT d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1" {
  1 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 USING COVERING INDEX i2}
  2 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t2}
  2 0 0 {USE TEMP B-TREE FOR ORDER BY}
  0 0 0 {COMPOUND SUBQUERIES 1 AND 2 (EXCEPT)}
}


#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
................................................................................
    set data [read $fd]
    close $fd
    set data
  }] [list $res]
}

do_peqp_test 6.1 {
  SELECT a FROM t1 EXCEPT SELECT d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1
} [string trimleft {
1 0 0 SCAN TABLE t1 USING COVERING INDEX i2
2 0 0 SCAN TABLE t2
2 0 0 USE TEMP B-TREE FOR ORDER BY
0 0 0 COMPOUND SUBQUERIES 1 AND 2 (EXCEPT)
}]

................................................................................
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# The following tests - eqp-7.* - test that queries that use the OP_Count
# optimization return something sensible with EQP.
#
drop_all_tables

do_execsql_test 7.0 {
  CREATE TABLE t1(a INT, b INT, ex TEXT);
  CREATE TABLE t2(a INT, b INT, ex TEXT);
  CREATE INDEX i1 ON t2(a);
}

det 7.1 "SELECT count(*) FROM t1" {
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1}
}

det 7.2 "SELECT count(*) FROM t2" {
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t2 USING COVERING INDEX i1}
}

do_execsql_test 7.3 {
  INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 2);
  INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3, 4);

  INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(1, 2);
  INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(3, 4);
  INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(5, 6);
 
  ANALYZE;
}

db close
sqlite3 db test.db

# EVIDENCE-OF: R-37879-39987 sqlite> EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
# SELECT a FROM t1 UNION SELECT c FROM t2;
# 1|0|0|SCAN TABLE t1
# 2|0|0|SCAN TABLE t2
# 0|0|0|COMPOUND SUBQUERIES 1 AND 2 USING TEMP B-TREE (UNION)
#
det 5.12 "SELECT a,b FROM t1 UNION SELECT c, 99 FROM t2" {
  1 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 USING COVERING INDEX i2}
  2 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t2 USING COVERING INDEX i4}
  0 0 0 {COMPOUND SUBQUERIES 1 AND 2 USING TEMP B-TREE (UNION)}
}

# EVIDENCE-OF: R-44864-63011 sqlite> EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
# SELECT a FROM t1 EXCEPT SELECT d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1;
# 1|0|0|SCAN TABLE t1 USING COVERING INDEX i2
# 2|0|0|SCAN TABLE t2 2|0|0|USE TEMP B-TREE FOR ORDER BY
# 0|0|0|COMPOUND SUBQUERIES 1 AND 2 (EXCEPT)
#
det 5.13 "SELECT a FROM t1 EXCEPT SELECT d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1" {
  1 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 USING COVERING INDEX i1}
  2 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t2}
  2 0 0 {USE TEMP B-TREE FOR ORDER BY}
  0 0 0 {COMPOUND SUBQUERIES 1 AND 2 (EXCEPT)}
}


#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
................................................................................
    set data [read $fd]
    close $fd
    set data
  }] [list $res]
}

do_peqp_test 6.1 {
  SELECT a, b FROM t1 EXCEPT SELECT d, 99 FROM t2 ORDER BY 1
} [string trimleft {
1 0 0 SCAN TABLE t1 USING COVERING INDEX i2
2 0 0 SCAN TABLE t2
2 0 0 USE TEMP B-TREE FOR ORDER BY
0 0 0 COMPOUND SUBQUERIES 1 AND 2 (EXCEPT)
}]

................................................................................
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# The following tests - eqp-7.* - test that queries that use the OP_Count
# optimization return something sensible with EQP.
#
drop_all_tables

do_execsql_test 7.0 {
  CREATE TABLE t1(a INT, b INT, ex CHAR(100));
  CREATE TABLE t2(a INT, b INT, ex CHAR(100));
  CREATE INDEX i1 ON t2(a);
}

det 7.1 "SELECT count(*) FROM t1" {
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1}
}

det 7.2 "SELECT count(*) FROM t2" {
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t2 USING COVERING INDEX i1}
}

do_execsql_test 7.3 {
  INSERT INTO t1(a,b) VALUES(1, 2);
  INSERT INTO t1(a,b) VALUES(3, 4);

  INSERT INTO t2(a,b) VALUES(1, 2);
  INSERT INTO t2(a,b) VALUES(3, 4);
  INSERT INTO t2(a,b) VALUES(5, 6);
 
  ANALYZE;
}

db close
sqlite3 db test.db

} {10.0}
do_test subquery-2.5.3.2 {
  # Verify that the t4i index was not used in the previous query
  execsql {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT * FROM t4 WHERE x IN (SELECT a FROM t3);
  }
} {/SCAN TABLE t4 /}
do_test subquery-2.5.4 {
  execsql {
    DROP TABLE t3;
    DROP TABLE t4;
  }
} {}

} {10.0}
do_test subquery-2.5.3.2 {
  # Verify that the t4i index was not used in the previous query
  execsql {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT * FROM t4 WHERE x IN (SELECT a FROM t3);
  }
} {~/t4i/}
do_test subquery-2.5.4 {
  execsql {
    DROP TABLE t3;
    DROP TABLE t4;
  }
} {}

#

set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
source $testdir/tester.tcl

do_test tkt-78e04-1.0 {
  execsql {
    CREATE TABLE ""("" UNIQUE);
    CREATE TABLE t2(x);
    INSERT INTO "" VALUES(1);
    INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2);
    SELECT * FROM "", t2;
  }
} {1 2}
do_test tkt-78e04-1.1 {
  catchsql {
    INSERT INTO "" VALUES(1);
  }
} {1 {column  is not unique}}
do_test tkt-78e04-1.2 {
  execsql {
    PRAGMA table_info("");
  }
} {0 {} {} 0 {} 0}
do_test tkt-78e04-1.3 {
  execsql {
    CREATE INDEX i1 ON ""("" COLLATE nocase);
  }
} {}
do_test tkt-78e04-1.4 {
  execsql {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM "" WHERE "" LIKE 'abc%';
  }
} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE  USING COVERING INDEX i1}}
do_test tkt-78e04-1.5 {
  execsql {
    DROP TABLE "";
    SELECT name FROM sqlite_master;
  }

#

set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
source $testdir/tester.tcl

do_test tkt-78e04-1.0 {
  execsql {
    CREATE TABLE ""("" UNIQUE, x CHAR(100));
    CREATE TABLE t2(x);
    INSERT INTO ""("") VALUES(1);
    INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2);
    SELECT * FROM "", t2;
  }
} {1 {} 2}
do_test tkt-78e04-1.1 {
  catchsql {
    INSERT INTO ""("") VALUES(1);
  }
} {1 {column  is not unique}}
do_test tkt-78e04-1.2 {
  execsql {
    PRAGMA table_info("");
  }
} {0 {} {} 0 {} 0 1 x CHAR(100) 0 {} 0}
do_test tkt-78e04-1.3 {
  execsql {
    CREATE INDEX i1 ON ""("" COLLATE nocase);
  }
} {}
do_test tkt-78e04-1.4 {
  execsql {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT "" FROM "" WHERE "" LIKE 'abc%';
  }
} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE  USING COVERING INDEX i1}}
do_test tkt-78e04-1.5 {
  execsql {
    DROP TABLE "";
    SELECT name FROM sqlite_master;
  }

#
# When optimizing out ORDER BY clauses, make sure that trailing terms
# of the ORDER BY clause do not reference other tables in a join.
#
if {[permutation] != "no_optimization"} {
do_test where-14.1 {
  execsql {
    CREATE TABLE t8(a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, b TEXT UNIQUE);
    INSERT INTO t8 VALUES(1,'one');
    INSERT INTO t8 VALUES(4,'four');
  }
  cksort {
    SELECT x.a || '/' || y.a FROM t8 x, t8 y ORDER BY x.a, y.b
  } 
} {1/4 1/1 4/4 4/1 nosort}
do_test where-14.2 {
  cksort {

#
# When optimizing out ORDER BY clauses, make sure that trailing terms
# of the ORDER BY clause do not reference other tables in a join.
#
if {[permutation] != "no_optimization"} {
do_test where-14.1 {
  execsql {
    CREATE TABLE t8(a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, b TEXT UNIQUE, c CHAR(100));
    INSERT INTO t8(a,b) VALUES(1,'one');
    INSERT INTO t8(a,b) VALUES(4,'four');
  }
  cksort {
    SELECT x.a || '/' || y.a FROM t8 x, t8 y ORDER BY x.a, y.b
  } 
} {1/4 1/1 4/4 4/1 nosort}
do_test where-14.2 {
  cksort {

if {[permutation] != "no_optimization"} {

# Ticket #2249.  Make sure the OR optimization is not attempted if
# comparisons between columns of different affinities are needed.
#
do_test where2-6.7 {
  execsql {
    CREATE TABLE t2249a(a TEXT UNIQUE);
    CREATE TABLE t2249b(b INTEGER);
    INSERT INTO t2249a VALUES('0123');
    INSERT INTO t2249b VALUES(123);
  }
  queryplan {
    -- Because a is type TEXT and b is type INTEGER, both a and b
    -- will attempt to convert to NUMERIC before the comparison.
    -- They will thus compare equal.
    --
    SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE a=b;
  }
} {123 0123 nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
do_test where2-6.9 {
  queryplan {
    -- The + operator removes affinity from the rhs.  No conversions
    -- occur and the comparison is false.  The result is an empty set.
    --
    SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE a=+b;
  }
} {nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
do_test where2-6.9.2 {
  # The same thing but with the expression flipped around.
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE +b=a
  }
} {nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
do_test where2-6.10 {
  queryplan {
    -- Use + on both sides of the comparison to disable indices
    -- completely.  Make sure we get the same result.
    --
    SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE +a=+b;
  }
} {nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
do_test where2-6.11 {
  # This will not attempt the OR optimization because of the a=b
  # comparison.
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE a=b OR a='hello';
  }
} {123 0123 nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
do_test where2-6.11.2 {
  # Permutations of the expression terms.
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE b=a OR a='hello';
  }
} {123 0123 nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
do_test where2-6.11.3 {
  # Permutations of the expression terms.
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE 'hello'=a OR b=a;
  }
} {123 0123 nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
do_test where2-6.11.4 {
  # Permutations of the expression terms.
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE a='hello' OR b=a;
  }
} {123 0123 nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
ifcapable explain&&subquery {
  # These tests are not run if subquery support is not included in the
  # build. This is because these tests test the "a = 1 OR a = 2" to
  # "a IN (1, 2)" optimisation transformation, which is not enabled if
  # subqueries and the IN operator is not available.
  #
  do_test where2-6.12 {
    # In this case, the +b disables the affinity conflict and allows
    # the OR optimization to be used again.  The result is now an empty
    # set, the same as in where2-6.9.
    queryplan {
      SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE a=+b OR a='hello';
    }
  } {nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
  do_test where2-6.12.2 {
    # In this case, the +b disables the affinity conflict and allows
    # the OR optimization to be used again.  The result is now an empty
    # set, the same as in where2-6.9.
    queryplan {
      SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE a='hello' OR +b=a;
    }
  } {nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
  do_test where2-6.12.3 {
    # In this case, the +b disables the affinity conflict and allows
    # the OR optimization to be used again.  The result is now an empty
    # set, the same as in where2-6.9.
    queryplan {
      SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE +b=a OR a='hello';
    }
  } {nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
  do_test where2-6.13 {
    # The addition of +a on the second term disabled the OR optimization.
    # But we should still get the same empty-set result as in where2-6.9.
    queryplan {
      SELECT * FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE a=+b OR +a='hello';
    }
  } {nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
}

# Variations on the order of terms in a WHERE clause in order
# to make sure the OR optimizer can recognize them all.
do_test where2-6.20 {
  queryplan {
    SELECT * FROM t2249a x CROSS JOIN t2249a y WHERE x.a=y.a
  }
} {0123 0123 nosort x sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1 y sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
ifcapable explain&&subquery {
  # These tests are not run if subquery support is not included in the
  # build. This is because these tests test the "a = 1 OR a = 2" to
  # "a IN (1, 2)" optimisation transformation, which is not enabled if
  # subqueries and the IN operator is not available.
  #
  do_test where2-6.21 {
    queryplan {

      SELECT * FROM t2249a x CROSS JOIN t2249a y WHERE x.a=y.a OR y.a='hello'
    }
  } {0123 0123 nosort x sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1 y sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
  do_test where2-6.22 {
    queryplan {

      SELECT * FROM t2249a x CROSS JOIN t2249a y WHERE y.a=x.a OR y.a='hello'
    }
  } {0123 0123 nosort x sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1 y sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
  do_test where2-6.23 {
    queryplan {

      SELECT * FROM t2249a x CROSS JOIN t2249a y WHERE y.a='hello' OR x.a=y.a
    }
  } {0123 0123 nosort x sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1 y sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
}

# Unique queries (queries that are guaranteed to return only a single
# row of result) do not call the sorter.  But all tables must give
# a unique result.  If any one table in the join does not give a unique
................................................................................
  }
} {4 8 10}

# Verify that the OR clause is used in an outer loop even when
# the OR clause scores slightly better on an inner loop.
if {[permutation] != "no_optimization"} {
do_execsql_test where2-12.1 {
  CREATE TABLE t12(x INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, y);
  CREATE INDEX t12y ON t12(y);
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT a.x, b.x
      FROM t12 AS a JOIN t12 AS b ON a.y=b.x
     WHERE (b.x=$abc OR b.y=$abc);
} {/.*SEARCH TABLE t12 AS b .*SEARCH TABLE t12 AS b .*/}
}


finish_test

if {[permutation] != "no_optimization"} {

# Ticket #2249.  Make sure the OR optimization is not attempted if
# comparisons between columns of different affinities are needed.
#
do_test where2-6.7 {
  execsql {
    CREATE TABLE t2249a(a TEXT UNIQUE, x CHAR(100));
    CREATE TABLE t2249b(b INTEGER);
    INSERT INTO t2249a(a) VALUES('0123');
    INSERT INTO t2249b VALUES(123);
  }
  queryplan {
    -- Because a is type TEXT and b is type INTEGER, both a and b
    -- will attempt to convert to NUMERIC before the comparison.
    -- They will thus compare equal.
    --
    SELECT b,a FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE a=b;
  }
} {123 0123 nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
do_test where2-6.9 {
  queryplan {
    -- The + operator removes affinity from the rhs.  No conversions
    -- occur and the comparison is false.  The result is an empty set.
    --
    SELECT b,a FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE a=+b;
  }
} {nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
do_test where2-6.9.2 {
  # The same thing but with the expression flipped around.
  queryplan {
    SELECT b,a FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE +b=a
  }
} {nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
do_test where2-6.10 {
  queryplan {
    -- Use + on both sides of the comparison to disable indices
    -- completely.  Make sure we get the same result.
    --
    SELECT b,a FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE +a=+b;
  }
} {nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
do_test where2-6.11 {
  # This will not attempt the OR optimization because of the a=b
  # comparison.
  queryplan {
    SELECT b,a FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE a=b OR a='hello';
  }
} {123 0123 nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
do_test where2-6.11.2 {
  # Permutations of the expression terms.
  queryplan {
    SELECT b,a FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE b=a OR a='hello';
  }
} {123 0123 nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
do_test where2-6.11.3 {
  # Permutations of the expression terms.
  queryplan {
    SELECT b,a FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE 'hello'=a OR b=a;
  }
} {123 0123 nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
do_test where2-6.11.4 {
  # Permutations of the expression terms.
  queryplan {
    SELECT b,a FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE a='hello' OR b=a;
  }
} {123 0123 nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
ifcapable explain&&subquery {
  # These tests are not run if subquery support is not included in the
  # build. This is because these tests test the "a = 1 OR a = 2" to
  # "a IN (1, 2)" optimisation transformation, which is not enabled if
  # subqueries and the IN operator is not available.
  #
  do_test where2-6.12 {
    # In this case, the +b disables the affinity conflict and allows
    # the OR optimization to be used again.  The result is now an empty
    # set, the same as in where2-6.9.
    queryplan {
      SELECT b,a FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE a=+b OR a='hello';
    }
  } {nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
  do_test where2-6.12.2 {
    # In this case, the +b disables the affinity conflict and allows
    # the OR optimization to be used again.  The result is now an empty
    # set, the same as in where2-6.9.
    queryplan {
      SELECT b,a FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE a='hello' OR +b=a;
    }
  } {nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
  do_test where2-6.12.3 {
    # In this case, the +b disables the affinity conflict and allows
    # the OR optimization to be used again.  The result is now an empty
    # set, the same as in where2-6.9.
    queryplan {
      SELECT b,a FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE +b=a OR a='hello';
    }
  } {nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
  do_test where2-6.13 {
    # The addition of +a on the second term disabled the OR optimization.
    # But we should still get the same empty-set result as in where2-6.9.
    queryplan {
      SELECT b,a FROM t2249b CROSS JOIN t2249a WHERE a=+b OR +a='hello';
    }
  } {nosort t2249b * t2249a sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
}

# Variations on the order of terms in a WHERE clause in order
# to make sure the OR optimizer can recognize them all.
do_test where2-6.20 {
  queryplan {
    SELECT x.a, y.a FROM t2249a x CROSS JOIN t2249a y WHERE x.a=y.a
  }
} {0123 0123 nosort x sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1 y sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
ifcapable explain&&subquery {
  # These tests are not run if subquery support is not included in the
  # build. This is because these tests test the "a = 1 OR a = 2" to
  # "a IN (1, 2)" optimisation transformation, which is not enabled if
  # subqueries and the IN operator is not available.
  #
  do_test where2-6.21 {
    queryplan {
      SELECT x.a,y.a FROM t2249a x CROSS JOIN t2249a y
       WHERE x.a=y.a OR y.a='hello'
    }
  } {0123 0123 nosort x sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1 y sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
  do_test where2-6.22 {
    queryplan {
      SELECT x.a,y.a FROM t2249a x CROSS JOIN t2249a y
       WHERE y.a=x.a OR y.a='hello'
    }
  } {0123 0123 nosort x sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1 y sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
  do_test where2-6.23 {
    queryplan {
      SELECT x.a,y.a FROM t2249a x CROSS JOIN t2249a y
       WHERE y.a='hello' OR x.a=y.a
    }
  } {0123 0123 nosort x sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1 y sqlite_autoindex_t2249a_1}
}

# Unique queries (queries that are guaranteed to return only a single
# row of result) do not call the sorter.  But all tables must give
# a unique result.  If any one table in the join does not give a unique
................................................................................
  }
} {4 8 10}

# Verify that the OR clause is used in an outer loop even when
# the OR clause scores slightly better on an inner loop.
if {[permutation] != "no_optimization"} {
do_execsql_test where2-12.1 {
  CREATE TABLE t12(x INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, y INT, z CHAR(100));
  CREATE INDEX t12y ON t12(y);
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT a.x, b.x
      FROM t12 AS a JOIN t12 AS b ON a.y=b.x
     WHERE (b.x=$abc OR b.y=$abc);
} {/.*SEARCH TABLE t12 AS b .*SEARCH TABLE t12 AS b .*/}
}


finish_test