Many hyperlinks are disabled.
Use anonymous login
to enable hyperlinks.
Overview
Comment: | Add a couple of tests to see if the new compound select optimizations work when the compound select is hidden inside a view. (CVS 5327) |
---|---|
Downloads: | Tarball | ZIP archive |
Timelines: | family | ancestors | descendants | both | trunk |
Files: | files | file ages | folders |
SHA1: |
1a711249c25aafbaf08057ffdcbb9cf2 |
User & Date: | danielk1977 2008-06-30 07:53:10.000 |
Context
2008-06-30
| ||
10:16 | Fix a malloc() failure related problem in os_unix.c. (CVS 5328) (check-in: ba8819a6f3 user: danielk1977 tags: trunk) | |
07:53 | Add a couple of tests to see if the new compound select optimizations work when the compound select is hidden inside a view. (CVS 5327) (check-in: 1a711249c2 user: danielk1977 tags: trunk) | |
2008-06-28
| ||
15:33 | Remove an assert() that was failing if there were any open incremental blob handles when a statement transaction was rolled back. (CVS 5326) (check-in: f66491ab2b user: danielk1977 tags: trunk) | |
Changes
Changes to test/select9.test.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | # 2008 June 24 # # The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of # a legal notice, here is a blessing: # # May you do good and not evil. # May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others. # May you share freely, never taking more than you give. # #*********************************************************************** # This file implements regression tests for SQLite library. # | | | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 | # 2008 June 24 # # The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of # a legal notice, here is a blessing: # # May you do good and not evil. # May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others. # May you share freely, never taking more than you give. # #*********************************************************************** # This file implements regression tests for SQLite library. # # $Id: select9.test,v 1.3 2008/06/30 07:53:10 danielk1977 Exp $ # The tests in this file are focused on test compound SELECT statements # that have any or all of an ORDER BY, LIMIT or OFFSET clauses. As of # version 3.6.0, SQLite contains code to use SQL indexes where possible # to optimize such statements. # |
︙ | ︙ | |||
323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 | } {4 5 6 7} test_compound_select select9-2.$iOuterLoop.4 { SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE a<8 INTERSECT SELECT d FROM t2 WHERE d<=3 ORDER BY 1 } {1 2 3} } | > > > > > | > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > | 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 | } {4 5 6 7} test_compound_select select9-2.$iOuterLoop.4 { SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE a<8 INTERSECT SELECT d FROM t2 WHERE d<=3 ORDER BY 1 } {1 2 3} } do_test select9-2.X { execsql { DROP INDEX i1; DROP INDEX i2; DROP INDEX i3; } } {} # This procedure executes the SQL. Then it checks the generated program # for the SQL and appends a "nosort" to the result if the program contains the # SortCallback opcode. If the program does not contain the SortCallback # opcode it appends "sort" # proc cksort {sql} { set ::sqlite_sort_count 0 set data [execsql $sql] if {$::sqlite_sort_count} {set x sort} {set x nosort} lappend data $x return $data } # If the right indexes exist, the following query: # # SELECT t1.a FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT t2.d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1 # # can use indexes to run without doing a in-memory sort operation. # This block of tests (select9-3.*) is used to check if the same # is possible with: # # CREATE VIEW v1 AS SELECT a FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d FROM t2 # SELECT a FROM v1 ORDER BY 1 # # Currently it is not. # do_test select9-3.1 { cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY 1 } } {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 sort} do_test select9-3.2 { execsql { CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a) } cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY 1 } } {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 nosort} do_test select9-3.3 { cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 } } {1 1 2 2 3 sort} do_test select9-3.4 { execsql { CREATE INDEX i2 ON t2(d) } cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 } } {1 1 2 2 3 nosort} do_test select9-3.5 { execsql { CREATE VIEW v1 AS SELECT a FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d FROM t2 } cksort { SELECT a FROM v1 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 } } {1 1 2 2 3 sort} do_test select9-3.X { execsql { DROP INDEX i1; DROP INDEX i2; DROP VIEW v1; } } {} # This block of tests is the same as the preceding one, except that # "UNION" is tested instead of "UNION ALL". # do_test select9-4.1 { cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY 1 } } {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 sort} do_test select9-4.2 { execsql { CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a) } cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY 1 } } {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 nosort} do_test select9-4.3 { cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 UNION SELECT d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 } } {1 2 3 4 5 sort} do_test select9-4.4 { execsql { CREATE INDEX i2 ON t2(d) } cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 UNION SELECT d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 } } {1 2 3 4 5 nosort} do_test select9-4.5 { execsql { CREATE VIEW v1 AS SELECT a FROM t1 UNION SELECT d FROM t2 } cksort { SELECT a FROM v1 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 } } {1 2 3 4 5 sort} do_test select9-4.X { execsql { DROP INDEX i1; DROP INDEX i2; DROP VIEW v1; } } {} finish_test |