This Day In History For 2022-05-27
1 Year Ago (more context)
|
2021-05-27
| ||
| 23:36 | • Reply: nested case statement not working artifact: 7a49b2631e user: kmedcalf | |
| 23:18 | • Reply: Column name includes quotes used in RETURNING expr artifact: 6c141f151f user: jeremyevans | |
| 22:29 | • Reply: nested case statement not working artifact: 2db976769b user: nosacs | |
| 21:36 | • Reply: run shell commad in c++ artifact: 2e4570a749 user: anonymous | |
| 21:25 | • Reply: run shell commad in c++ artifact: 1a172c9b3c user: larrybr | |
| 20:47 | • Post: run shell commad in c++ artifact: 7135a84db0 user: anonymous | |
| 19:33 | • Reply: Is there a way to optimize this UPDATE command to run faster? artifact: 1294aed947 user: JohnSmith | |
| 19:10 | • Edit: Is there a way to optimize this UPDATE command to run faster? artifact: 3012fb5e37 user: JohnSmith | |
| 18:02 | • Reply: Inconsistent output possibly due to affinity issue artifact: 559dc7159e user: LY1598773890 | |
| 17:55 | • Reply: Is there a way to optimize this UPDATE command to run faster? artifact: 72a1d04ea7 user: kmedcalf | |
| 17:44 | • Reply: Update table from SQLite3 queries results. artifact: 3705e447eb user: hanche | |
| 17:30 | • Reply: Is there a way to optimize this UPDATE command to run faster? artifact: b3775df63c user: JohnSmith | |
| 17:21 | • Reply: The CopySQLiteInteropFiles target in the NuGet package no longer works in Visual Studio 16.10 artifact: 5a5a207710 user: BrunoJuchli | |
| 17:19 | • Reply: The CopySQLiteInteropFiles target in the NuGet package no longer works in Visual Studio 16.10 artifact: e4c09bad74 user: BrunoJuchli | |
| 16:56 | • Reply: The CopySQLiteInteropFiles target in the NuGet package no longer works in Visual Studio 16.10 artifact: 7e56f83f2e user: anonymous | |
| 16:36 | • Reply: Is there a way to optimize this UPDATE command to run faster? artifact: aa88c9752d user: billwade | |
| 16:23 | • Reply: Is there a way to optimize this UPDATE command to run faster? artifact: 22efec62e6 user: anonymous | |
| 16:21 | • Reply: Is there a way to optimize this UPDATE command to run faster? artifact: 90f7c9ed54 user: dvdraymond | |
| 14:37 | • Reply: Is there a way to optimize this UPDATE command to run faster? artifact: fea43ab34e user: JohnSmith | |
| 14:36 | • Edit: Is there a way to optimize this UPDATE command to run faster? artifact: 5bf729328c user: JohnSmith | |
| 14:21 | • Reply: Is there a way to optimize this UPDATE command to run faster? artifact: 4e0c9653b7 user: hanche | |
| 13:52 | • Post: Is there a way to optimize this UPDATE command to run faster? artifact: 590d19f1df user: JohnSmith | |
| 13:47 | • Reply: The CopySQLiteInteropFiles target in the NuGet package no longer works in Visual Studio 16.10 artifact: b691c70864 user: anonymous | |
| 10:28 | • Reply: Inconsistent output possibly due to affinity issue artifact: 8ae88cd0bc user: kmedcalf | |
| 07:14 | • Reply: index to help with selection and ordering artifact: f1a6189d6e user: markxwagner | |
| 01:56 | • Reply: index to help with selection and ordering artifact: 34144546c5 user: cuz | |
| 01:33 | • Reply: index to help with selection and ordering artifact: 2981ef024d user: kmedcalf | |
| 00:02 | • Reply: index to help with selection and ordering artifact: 49e7be4b21 user: GSnyder | |
2 Years Ago (more context)
|
2020-05-27
| ||
| 21:48 | • Reply: SQLITE_DETERMINISTIC change in 3.32 artifact: 552e8e236a user: rogerbinns | |
| 21:00 | • Post: Statement diagrams in the documentation not readable by screen readers artifact: 26cb9a260d user: miki123211 | |
| 20:59 | • Reply: SQLITE_DETERMINISTIC change in 3.32 artifact: 3cbcc77145 user: coleifer | |
| 19:17 | • Reply: SQLITE_DETERMINISTIC change in 3.32 artifact: 812d990f27 user: drh | |
| 19:14 | • Edit reply: SQLITE_DETERMINISTIC change in 3.32 artifact: 6f62ed5dcc user: stephan | |
| 19:14 | • Reply: SQLITE_DETERMINISTIC change in 3.32 artifact: 9d19acfc4e user: stephan | |
| 19:12 | • Reply: 64-bit precompiled Linux binaries artifact: 8b223b6631 user: stephan | |
| 18:51 | • Post: 64-bit precompiled Linux binaries artifact: 66cd156045 user: daniel15 | |
| 18:33 | • Post: SQLITE_DETERMINISTIC change in 3.32 artifact: bc6ed1f746 user: rogerbinns | |
| 14:56 | • Reply: SQLITE_HAS_CODE is gone? artifact: fee74b1fc9 user: utelle | |
| 14:24 | • Edit: memory leaks in sqlite3.c:23618 artifact: 751bdb04f5 user: zxc8263735 | |
| 14:23 | • Edit: memory leaks in sqlite3.c:23545 artifact: c5bcdc036d user: zxc8263735 | |
| 14:12 | • Reply: SQLITE_HAS_CODE is gone? artifact: ba2ef6a842 user: ronaaron | |
| 14:06 | • Reply: SQLITE_HAS_CODE is gone? artifact: dd056b6f40 user: tonyp | |
| 12:08 | • Reply: How to set the column separator for the CSV extension in the CLI? artifact: fffbc0c6db user: anonymous | |
| 10:40 | • Reply: Querying first of each month artifact: c84d629997 user: rwillett | |
| 10:27 | • Reply: deterministic functions behave differently in version 3.32.1 with python3 artifact: 52d80bf6da user: kmedcalf | |
| 09:39 | • Reply: Cannot load a custom Virtual Table using PHP artifact: 56bde455ca user: anonymous | |
| 09:11 | • Reply: deterministic functions behave differently in version 3.32.1 with python3 artifact: 4cea1c5a4c user: TripeHound | |
| 09:08 | • Reply: memory leaks in sqlite3.c:23618 artifact: 0123da8ee5 user: anonymous | |
| 09:01 | • Reply: memory leaks in sqlite3.c:23545 artifact: 9ac3dc5495 user: stephan | |
| 08:47 | • Reply: memory leaks in sqlite3.c:23545 artifact: 41e7a79b46 user: anonymous | |
| 08:20 | • Post: deterministic functions behave differently in version 3.32.1 with python3 artifact: e79a299b3f user: odubaj | |
| 06:07 | • Reply: memory leaks in sqlite3.c:23545 artifact: 2f37a24393 user: zxc8263735 | |
| 06:03 | • Reply: memory leaks in sqlite3.c:23618 artifact: 3b8d414fb9 user: zxc8263735 | |
| 05:31 | • Reply: SQLITE_HAS_CODE is gone? artifact: 74fac32030 user: ronaaron | |
| 02:24 | • Post: Newbie question: Has there ever been any attempt by anyone to build a GraphDB version of SQLite? artifact: f9c95559d1 user: kimstacks | |