Many hyperlinks are disabled.
Use anonymous login
to enable hyperlinks.
Overview
Comment: | Minor edits to whynotgit.html due to Reddit comments. |
---|---|
Downloads: | Tarball | ZIP archive |
Timelines: | family | ancestors | descendants | both | trunk |
Files: | files | file ages | folders |
SHA3-256: |
2ad4610bdf102736666603cc07f59696 |
User & Date: | drh 2018-04-14 10:22:44.994 |
Context
2018-04-14
| ||
11:02 | Add a link to the revision history of the whynotgit.html document. (check-in: 34c5347f0b user: drh tags: trunk) | |
10:22 | Minor edits to whynotgit.html due to Reddit comments. (check-in: 2ad4610bdf user: drh tags: trunk) | |
2018-04-13
| ||
15:09 | Fix a minor formatting issue in the tempfiles.html document. (check-in: 9f03d7ca10 user: drh tags: trunk) | |
Changes
Changes to pages/whynotgit.in.
︙ | ︙ | |||
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 | [https://git-scm.org|Git] version control system like everybody else. This article attempts to answer that question. Also, in <a href="#getthecode">section 3</a>, this article provides hints to Git users about how they can easily access the SQLite source code. | | < | > > | < < < < | > | 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 | [https://git-scm.org|Git] version control system like everybody else. This article attempts to answer that question. Also, in <a href="#getthecode">section 3</a>, this article provides hints to Git users about how they can easily access the SQLite source code. <h2>Edits</h2> <p> This article has been revised multiple times in an attempt to address concerns and misgivings and to fix inaccuracies identified on [https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16806114|Hacker News] and on [https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/8c2niw/why_sqlite_does_not_use_git/|Reddit]. <h1>A Few Reasons Why SQLite Does Not Use Git</h1> <p> One could summarize the reason why SQLite does not use Git in a single sentence: The lead SQLite developer finds Git to be unpalatable. If you like Git and want to use it, that's great. |
︙ | ︙ | |||
177 178 179 180 181 182 183 | which is that it is "distributed". There are various free alternatives to GitHub, such as GitLab, but those too have a lot of dependencies and require a lot of server setup. <p> In contrast, Fossil is a single standalone binary which one installs by placing it to $PATH. That one binary contains all | | | 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 | which is that it is "distributed". There are various free alternatives to GitHub, such as GitLab, but those too have a lot of dependencies and require a lot of server setup. <p> In contrast, Fossil is a single standalone binary which one installs by placing it to $PATH. That one binary contains all the functionality of core Git and also GitHub and/or GitLab. It manages a community server with wiki and bug tracking, provides packaged downloads for consumers, login managements, and so forth, with no extra software required. <p> Less administration means that programmers spend more time working on the software (SQLite in this case) and less time fussing with |
︙ | ︙ |