WherePlan *pPlan = &pLevel->plan;
  Index *pIndex = pPlan->u.pIdx;
  int nEq = pPlan->nEq;
  char *zRet = 0;
  int i;

  for(i=0; i<nEq; i++){
    char *zCol = pTab->aCol[pIndex->aiColumn[i]].zName;
    zRet = sqlite3MAppendf(db, zRet, 
        "%s%s%s=?", (zRet?zRet:""), (zRet?" AND ":""), zCol);


  }

  if( pPlan->wsFlags&WHERE_BTM_LIMIT ){
    zRet = sqlite3MAppendf(db, zRet,
        "%s%s%s>?", (zRet?zRet:""), (zRet?" AND ":""), pTab->aCol[nEq].zName);


  }
  if( pPlan->wsFlags&WHERE_TOP_LIMIT ){
    zRet = sqlite3MAppendf(db, zRet,
        "%s%s%s<?", (zRet?zRet:""), (zRet?" AND ":""), pTab->aCol[nEq].zName);


  }

  if( zRet ){
    zRet = sqlite3MAppendf(db, zRet, " (%s)", zRet);
  }

  return zRet;

  WherePlan *pPlan = &pLevel->plan;
  Index *pIndex = pPlan->u.pIdx;
  int nEq = pPlan->nEq;
  char *zRet = 0;
  int i;

  for(i=0; i<nEq; i++){

    zRet = sqlite3MAppendf(db, zRet, 
        "%s%s%s=?", (zRet?zRet:""), (zRet?" AND ":""), 
        pTab->aCol[pIndex->aiColumn[i]].zName
    );
  }

  if( pPlan->wsFlags&WHERE_BTM_LIMIT ){
    zRet = sqlite3MAppendf(db, zRet,
        "%s%s%s>?", (zRet?zRet:""), (zRet?" AND ":""),
        pTab->aCol[pIndex->aiColumn[i]].zName
    );
  }
  if( pPlan->wsFlags&WHERE_TOP_LIMIT ){
    zRet = sqlite3MAppendf(db, zRet,
        "%s%s%s<?", (zRet?zRet:""), (zRet?" AND ":""), 
        pTab->aCol[pIndex->aiColumn[i]].zName
    );
  }

  if( zRet ){
    zRet = sqlite3MAppendf(db, zRet, " (%s)", zRet);
  }

  return zRet;

           AND later.owner_change_date > prev.owner_change_date
           AND later.owner_change_date <= s.date_of_registration||' 00:00:00')
       ) y ON x.sheep_no = y.sheep_no
   WHERE y.sheep_no IS NULL
   ORDER BY x.registering_flock;
} {
  1 0 0 {SCAN TABLE sheep AS s (~1000000 rows)} 
  1 1 1 {SCAN TABLE flock_owner AS prev BY INDEX sqlite_autoindex_flock_owner_1 (flock_no=? AND flock_no<?) (~2 rows)} 
  1 0 0 {EXECUTE CORRELATED SCALAR SUBQUERY 2} 
  2 0 0 {SCAN TABLE flock_owner AS later BY COVERING INDEX sqlite_autoindex_flock_owner_1 (flock_no=? AND flock_no>? AND flock_no<?) (~1 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE sheep AS x BY INDEX sheep_reg_flock_index (~1000000 rows)} 
  0 1 1 {SCAN SUBQUERY 1 AS y BY AUTOMATIC COVERING INDEX (sheep_no=?) (~7 rows)}
}

finish_test

           AND later.owner_change_date > prev.owner_change_date
           AND later.owner_change_date <= s.date_of_registration||' 00:00:00')
       ) y ON x.sheep_no = y.sheep_no
   WHERE y.sheep_no IS NULL
   ORDER BY x.registering_flock;
} {
  1 0 0 {SCAN TABLE sheep AS s (~1000000 rows)} 
  1 1 1 {SCAN TABLE flock_owner AS prev BY INDEX sqlite_autoindex_flock_owner_1 (flock_no=? AND owner_change_date<?) (~2 rows)} 
  1 0 0 {EXECUTE CORRELATED SCALAR SUBQUERY 2} 
  2 0 0 {SCAN TABLE flock_owner AS later BY COVERING INDEX sqlite_autoindex_flock_owner_1 (flock_no=? AND owner_change_date>? AND owner_change_date<?) (~1 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE sheep AS x BY INDEX sheep_reg_flock_index (~1000000 rows)} 
  0 1 1 {SCAN SUBQUERY 1 AS y BY AUTOMATIC COVERING INDEX (sheep_no=?) (~7 rows)}
}

finish_test

  1    "EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b = 5" 
       {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY INDEX sqlite_autoindex_t1_1 (b=?) (~1 rows)}}

  2    "EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t2 ORDER BY b, c"
       {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t2 BY INDEX sqlite_autoindex_t2_1 (~1000000 rows)}}

  3    "EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE b=10 AND c>10"
       {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t2 BY INDEX sqlite_autoindex_t2_1 (b=? AND b>?) (~3 rows)}}
}

# EVIDENCE-OF: R-45493-35653 A CHECK constraint may be attached to a
# column definition or specified as a table constraint. In practice it
# makes no difference.
#
#   All the tests that deal with CHECK constraints below (4.11.* and 

  1    "EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b = 5" 
       {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY INDEX sqlite_autoindex_t1_1 (b=?) (~1 rows)}}

  2    "EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t2 ORDER BY b, c"
       {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t2 BY INDEX sqlite_autoindex_t2_1 (~1000000 rows)}}

  3    "EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE b=10 AND c>10"
       {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t2 BY INDEX sqlite_autoindex_t2_1 (b=? AND c>?) (~3 rows)}}
}

# EVIDENCE-OF: R-45493-35653 A CHECK constraint may be attached to a
# column definition or specified as a table constraint. In practice it
# makes no difference.
#
#   All the tests that deal with CHECK constraints below (4.11.* and 

#***********************************************************************
#

set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
source $testdir/tester.tcl

set ::testprefix fts3fault




# Test error handling in the sqlite3Fts3Init() function. This is the 
# function that registers the FTS3 module and various support functions
# with SQLite.
#
do_faultsim_test 1 -body { 
  sqlite3 db test.db 

#***********************************************************************
#

set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
source $testdir/tester.tcl

set ::testprefix fts3fault

# If SQLITE_ENABLE_FTS3 is not defined, omit this file.
ifcapable !fts3 { finish_test ; return }

# Test error handling in the sqlite3Fts3Init() function. This is the 
# function that registers the FTS3 module and various support functions
# with SQLite.
#
do_faultsim_test 1 -body { 
  sqlite3 db test.db 

      AND t302.c3 > 1287603136
      AND (t301.c4 = 1407449685622784
           OR t301.c8 = 1407424651264000)
   ORDER BY t302.c5 LIMIT 200;
} {
  0 0 1 {SCAN TABLE t301 BY COVERING INDEX t301_c4 (c4=?) (~10 rows)} 
  0 0 1 {SCAN TABLE t301 BY INTEGER PRIMARY KEY (rowid=?) (~1 rows)} 
  0 1 0 {SCAN TABLE t302 BY INDEX t302_c8_c3 (c8=? AND c8>?) (~2 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {USE TEMP B-TREE FOR ORDER BY}
}

finish_test

      AND t302.c3 > 1287603136
      AND (t301.c4 = 1407449685622784
           OR t301.c8 = 1407424651264000)
   ORDER BY t302.c5 LIMIT 200;
} {
  0 0 1 {SCAN TABLE t301 BY COVERING INDEX t301_c4 (c4=?) (~10 rows)} 
  0 0 1 {SCAN TABLE t301 BY INTEGER PRIMARY KEY (rowid=?) (~1 rows)} 
  0 1 0 {SCAN TABLE t302 BY INDEX t302_c8_c3 (c8=? AND c3>?) (~2 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {USE TEMP B-TREE FOR ORDER BY}
}

finish_test

  # Likewise, inequalities in an AND are preferred over inequalities in
  # an OR.
  #
  do_execsql_test where9-5.3 {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE b>1000 AND (c>=31031 OR d IS NULL)
  } {
    0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY INDEX t1b (a>?) (~165000 rows)}
  }
}

############################################################################
# Make sure OR-clauses work correctly on UPDATE and DELETE statements.

do_test where9-6.2.1 {

  # Likewise, inequalities in an AND are preferred over inequalities in
  # an OR.
  #
  do_execsql_test where9-5.3 {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE b>1000 AND (c>=31031 OR d IS NULL)
  } {
    0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY INDEX t1b (b>?) (~165000 rows)}
  }
}

############################################################################
# Make sure OR-clauses work correctly on UPDATE and DELETE statements.

do_test where9-6.2.1 {