}
} {4087}

# Ticket [8011086c85c6c404014c947fcf3eb9f42b184a0d] from 2010-07-08
# Make sure automatic indices are not created for the RHS of an IN expression
# that is not a correlated subquery.
#
do_test autoindex1-500 {
  db eval {
    CREATE TABLE t501(a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, b);
    CREATE TABLE t502(x INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, y);
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT b FROM t501
     WHERE t501.a IN (SELECT x FROM t502 WHERE y=?);




  }
} {0 0 {TABLE t501 USING PRIMARY KEY} 0 0 {TABLE t502}}
do_test autoindex1-501 {
  db eval {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT b FROM t501
     WHERE t501.a IN (SELECT x FROM t502 WHERE y=t501.b);




  }
} {0 0 {TABLE t501} 0 0 {TABLE t502 WITH AUTOMATIC INDEX}}
do_test autoindex1-502 {
  db eval {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT b FROM t501
     WHERE t501.a=123
       AND t501.a IN (SELECT x FROM t502 WHERE y=t501.b);




  }
} {0 0 {TABLE t501 USING PRIMARY KEY} 0 0 {TABLE t502}}


# The following code checks a performance regression reported on the
# mailing list on 2010-10-19.  The problem is that the nRowEst field
# of ephermeral tables was not being initialized correctly and so no
# automatic index was being created for the emphemeral table when it was
# used as part of a join.
#
do_test autoindex1-600 {
  db eval {
    CREATE TABLE flock_owner(
      owner_rec_id INTEGER CONSTRAINT flock_owner_key PRIMARY KEY,
      flock_no VARCHAR(6) NOT NULL REFERENCES flock (flock_no),
      owner_person_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES person (person_id),
      owner_change_date TEXT, last_changed TEXT NOT NULL,
      CONSTRAINT fo_owner_date UNIQUE (flock_no, owner_change_date)
    );
    CREATE TABLE sheep (
      Sheep_No char(7) NOT NULL,
      Date_of_Birth char(8),
      Sort_DoB text,
      Flock_Book_Vol char(2),
      Breeder_No char(6),
      Breeder_Person integer,
      Originating_Flock char(6),
      Registering_Flock char(6),
      Tag_Prefix char(9),
      Tag_No char(15),
      Sort_Tag_No integer,
      Breeders_Temp_Tag char(15),
      Sex char(1),
      Sheep_Name char(32),
      Sire_No char(7),
      Dam_No char(7),
      Register_Code char(1),
      Colour char(48),
      Colour_Code char(2),
      Pattern_Code char(8),
      Horns char(1),
      Litter_Size char(1),
      Coeff_of_Inbreeding real,
      Date_of_Registration text,
      Date_Last_Changed text,
      UNIQUE(Sheep_No));
    CREATE INDEX fo_flock_no_index  
                ON flock_owner (flock_no);
    CREATE INDEX fo_owner_change_date_index  
                ON flock_owner (owner_change_date);
    CREATE INDEX fo_owner_person_id_index  
                ON flock_owner (owner_person_id);
    CREATE INDEX sheep_org_flock_index  
             ON sheep (originating_flock);
    CREATE INDEX sheep_reg_flock_index  
             ON sheep (registering_flock);
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT x.sheep_no, x.registering_flock, x.date_of_registration
     FROM sheep x LEFT JOIN
         (SELECT s.sheep_no, prev.flock_no, prev.owner_person_id,
         s.date_of_registration, prev.owner_change_date
         FROM sheep s JOIN flock_owner prev ON s.registering_flock =
     prev.flock_no
         AND (prev.owner_change_date <= s.date_of_registration || ' 00:00:00')
         WHERE NOT EXISTS
             (SELECT 'x' FROM flock_owner later
             WHERE prev.flock_no = later.flock_no
             AND later.owner_change_date > prev.owner_change_date
             AND later.owner_change_date <= s.date_of_registration||' 00:00:00')
         ) y ON x.sheep_no = y.sheep_no
     WHERE y.sheep_no IS NULL
     ORDER BY x.registering_flock;







  }
} {0 0 {TABLE sheep AS s} 1 1 {TABLE flock_owner AS prev WITH INDEX sqlite_autoindex_flock_owner_1} 0 0 {TABLE flock_owner AS later WITH INDEX sqlite_autoindex_flock_owner_1} 0 0 {TABLE sheep AS x WITH INDEX sheep_reg_flock_index ORDER BY} 1 1 {TABLE  AS y WITH AUTOMATIC INDEX}}

finish_test

  }
} {4087}

# Ticket [8011086c85c6c404014c947fcf3eb9f42b184a0d] from 2010-07-08
# Make sure automatic indices are not created for the RHS of an IN expression
# that is not a correlated subquery.
#
do_execsql_test autoindex1-500 {

  CREATE TABLE t501(a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, b);
  CREATE TABLE t502(x INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, y);
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
  SELECT b FROM t501
   WHERE t501.a IN (SELECT x FROM t502 WHERE y=?);
} {
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t501 BY INTEGER PRIMARY KEY (rowid=?) (~25 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {EXECUTE LIST SUBQUERY 1} 
  1 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t502 (~100000 rows)}
}

do_execsql_test autoindex1-501 {

  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
  SELECT b FROM t501
   WHERE t501.a IN (SELECT x FROM t502 WHERE y=t501.b);
} {
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t501 (~500000 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {EXECUTE CORRELATED LIST SUBQUERY 1} 
  1 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t502 BY AUTOMATIC COVERING INDEX (y=?) (~7 rows)}
}

do_execsql_test autoindex1-502 {

  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
  SELECT b FROM t501
   WHERE t501.a=123
     AND t501.a IN (SELECT x FROM t502 WHERE y=t501.b);
} {
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t501 BY INTEGER PRIMARY KEY (rowid=?) (~1 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {EXECUTE CORRELATED LIST SUBQUERY 1} 
  1 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t502 (~100000 rows)}
}



# The following code checks a performance regression reported on the
# mailing list on 2010-10-19.  The problem is that the nRowEst field
# of ephermeral tables was not being initialized correctly and so no
# automatic index was being created for the emphemeral table when it was
# used as part of a join.
#
do_execsql_test autoindex1-600 {

  CREATE TABLE flock_owner(
    owner_rec_id INTEGER CONSTRAINT flock_owner_key PRIMARY KEY,
    flock_no VARCHAR(6) NOT NULL REFERENCES flock (flock_no),
    owner_person_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES person (person_id),
    owner_change_date TEXT, last_changed TEXT NOT NULL,
    CONSTRAINT fo_owner_date UNIQUE (flock_no, owner_change_date)
  );
  CREATE TABLE sheep (
    Sheep_No char(7) NOT NULL,
    Date_of_Birth char(8),
    Sort_DoB text,
    Flock_Book_Vol char(2),
    Breeder_No char(6),
    Breeder_Person integer,
    Originating_Flock char(6),
    Registering_Flock char(6),
    Tag_Prefix char(9),
    Tag_No char(15),
    Sort_Tag_No integer,
    Breeders_Temp_Tag char(15),
    Sex char(1),
    Sheep_Name char(32),
    Sire_No char(7),
    Dam_No char(7),
    Register_Code char(1),
    Colour char(48),
    Colour_Code char(2),
    Pattern_Code char(8),
    Horns char(1),
    Litter_Size char(1),
    Coeff_of_Inbreeding real,
    Date_of_Registration text,
    Date_Last_Changed text,
    UNIQUE(Sheep_No));
  CREATE INDEX fo_flock_no_index  
              ON flock_owner (flock_no);
  CREATE INDEX fo_owner_change_date_index  
              ON flock_owner (owner_change_date);
  CREATE INDEX fo_owner_person_id_index  
              ON flock_owner (owner_person_id);
  CREATE INDEX sheep_org_flock_index  
           ON sheep (originating_flock);
  CREATE INDEX sheep_reg_flock_index  
           ON sheep (registering_flock);
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
  SELECT x.sheep_no, x.registering_flock, x.date_of_registration
   FROM sheep x LEFT JOIN
       (SELECT s.sheep_no, prev.flock_no, prev.owner_person_id,
       s.date_of_registration, prev.owner_change_date
       FROM sheep s JOIN flock_owner prev ON s.registering_flock =
   prev.flock_no
       AND (prev.owner_change_date <= s.date_of_registration || ' 00:00:00')
       WHERE NOT EXISTS
           (SELECT 'x' FROM flock_owner later
           WHERE prev.flock_no = later.flock_no
           AND later.owner_change_date > prev.owner_change_date
           AND later.owner_change_date <= s.date_of_registration||' 00:00:00')
       ) y ON x.sheep_no = y.sheep_no
   WHERE y.sheep_no IS NULL
   ORDER BY x.registering_flock;
} {
  1 0 0 {SCAN TABLE sheep AS s (~1000000 rows)} 
  1 1 1 {SCAN TABLE flock_owner AS prev BY INDEX sqlite_autoindex_flock_owner_1 (flock_no=? AND flock_no<?) (~2 rows)} 
  1 0 0 {EXECUTE CORRELATED SCALAR SUBQUERY 2} 
  2 0 0 {SCAN TABLE flock_owner AS later BY COVERING INDEX sqlite_autoindex_flock_owner_1 (flock_no=? AND flock_no>? AND flock_no<?) (~1 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE sheep AS x BY INDEX sheep_reg_flock_index (~1000000 rows)} 
  0 1 1 {SCAN SUBQUERY 1 AS y BY AUTOMATIC COVERING INDEX (sheep_no=?) (~7 rows)}
}


finish_test

#
do_execsql_test 4.10.0 {
  CREATE TABLE t1(a, b PRIMARY KEY);
  CREATE TABLE t2(a, b, c, UNIQUE(b, c));
}
do_createtable_tests 4.10 {
  1    "EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b = 5" 
       {0 0 {TABLE t1 WITH INDEX sqlite_autoindex_t1_1}}

  2    "EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t2 ORDER BY b, c"
       {0 0 {TABLE t2 WITH INDEX sqlite_autoindex_t2_1 ORDER BY}}

  3    "EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE b=10 AND c>10"
       {0 0 {TABLE t2 WITH INDEX sqlite_autoindex_t2_1}}
}

# EVIDENCE-OF: R-45493-35653 A CHECK constraint may be attached to a
# column definition or specified as a table constraint. In practice it
# makes no difference.
#
#   All the tests that deal with CHECK constraints below (4.11.* and 

#
do_execsql_test 4.10.0 {
  CREATE TABLE t1(a, b PRIMARY KEY);
  CREATE TABLE t2(a, b, c, UNIQUE(b, c));
}
do_createtable_tests 4.10 {
  1    "EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b = 5" 
       {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY INDEX sqlite_autoindex_t1_1 (b=?) (~1 rows)}}

  2    "EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t2 ORDER BY b, c"
       {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t2 BY INDEX sqlite_autoindex_t2_1 (~1000000 rows)}}

  3    "EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE b=10 AND c>10"
       {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t2 BY INDEX sqlite_autoindex_t2_1 (b=? AND b>?) (~3 rows)}}
}

# EVIDENCE-OF: R-45493-35653 A CHECK constraint may be attached to a
# column definition or specified as a table constraint. In practice it
# makes no difference.
#
#   All the tests that deal with CHECK constraints below (4.11.* and 

      trackid     INTEGER, 
      trackname   TEXT, 
      trackartist INTEGER,
      FOREIGN KEY(trackartist) REFERENCES artist(artistid)
    );
  }
} {}
do_test e_fkey-25.2 {
  execsql {
    PRAGMA foreign_keys = OFF;
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN DELETE FROM artist WHERE 1;
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT rowid FROM track WHERE trackartist = ?;



  }
} {0 0 {TABLE artist} 0 0 {TABLE track}}
do_test e_fkey-25.3 {
  execsql { 
    PRAGMA foreign_keys = ON;
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN DELETE FROM artist WHERE 1;



  }
} {0 0 {TABLE artist} 0 0 {TABLE track}}
do_test e_fkey-25.4 {
  execsql {
    INSERT INTO artist VALUES(5, 'artist 5');
    INSERT INTO artist VALUES(6, 'artist 6');
    INSERT INTO artist VALUES(7, 'artist 7');
    INSERT INTO track VALUES(1, 'track 1', 5);
    INSERT INTO track VALUES(2, 'track 2', 6);
................................................................................
    );
    CREATE INDEX trackindex ON track(trackartist);
  }
} {}
do_test e_fkey-27.2 {
  eqp { INSERT INTO artist VALUES(?, ?) }
} {}
do_test e_fkey-27.3 {
  eqp { UPDATE artist SET artistid = ?, artistname = ? }
} [list \
  0 0 {TABLE artist} \
  0 0 {TABLE track WITH INDEX trackindex} \
  0 0 {TABLE track WITH INDEX trackindex}
]

do_test e_fkey-27.4 {
  eqp { DELETE FROM artist }
} [list \
  0 0 {TABLE artist} \
  0 0 {TABLE track WITH INDEX trackindex}
]



###########################################################################
### SECTION 4.1: Composite Foreign Key Constraints
###########################################################################

#-------------------------------------------------------------------------

      trackid     INTEGER, 
      trackname   TEXT, 
      trackartist INTEGER,
      FOREIGN KEY(trackartist) REFERENCES artist(artistid)
    );
  }
} {}
do_execsql_test e_fkey-25.2 {

  PRAGMA foreign_keys = OFF;
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN DELETE FROM artist WHERE 1;
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT rowid FROM track WHERE trackartist = ?;
} {
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE artist (~1000000 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE track (~100000 rows)}
}

do_execsql_test e_fkey-25.3 {

  PRAGMA foreign_keys = ON;
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN DELETE FROM artist WHERE 1;
} {
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE artist (~1000000 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE track (~100000 rows)}
}

do_test e_fkey-25.4 {
  execsql {
    INSERT INTO artist VALUES(5, 'artist 5');
    INSERT INTO artist VALUES(6, 'artist 6');
    INSERT INTO artist VALUES(7, 'artist 7');
    INSERT INTO track VALUES(1, 'track 1', 5);
    INSERT INTO track VALUES(2, 'track 2', 6);
................................................................................
    );
    CREATE INDEX trackindex ON track(trackartist);
  }
} {}
do_test e_fkey-27.2 {
  eqp { INSERT INTO artist VALUES(?, ?) }
} {}
do_execsql_test e_fkey-27.3 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN UPDATE artist SET artistid = ?, artistname = ?
} {
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE artist (~1000000 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE track BY COVERING INDEX trackindex (trackartist=?) (~10 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE track BY COVERING INDEX trackindex (trackartist=?) (~10 rows)}

}
do_execsql_test e_fkey-27.4 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN DELETE FROM artist
} {
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE artist (~1000000 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE track BY COVERING INDEX trackindex (trackartist=?) (~10 rows)}

}


###########################################################################
### SECTION 4.1: Composite Foreign Key Constraints
###########################################################################

#-------------------------------------------------------------------------

  1 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 (~1000000 rows)} 
  1 0 0 {USE TEMP B-TREE FOR ORDER BY} 
  2 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t2 BY INDEX t2i1 (~1000000 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {SCAN SUBQUERY 1 AS x1 (~1000000 rows)} 
  0 1 1 {SCAN SUBQUERY 2 AS x2 (~1000000 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {USE TEMP B-TREE FOR ORDER BY}
}























#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Test cases eqp-4.* - tests for composite select statements.
#
do_eqp_test 4.1.1 {
  SELECT * FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM t2
} {

  1 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 (~1000000 rows)} 
  1 0 0 {USE TEMP B-TREE FOR ORDER BY} 
  2 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t2 BY INDEX t2i1 (~1000000 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {SCAN SUBQUERY 1 AS x1 (~1000000 rows)} 
  0 1 1 {SCAN SUBQUERY 2 AS x2 (~1000000 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {USE TEMP B-TREE FOR ORDER BY}
}

det 3.3.1 {
  SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE y IN (SELECT y FROM t2)
} {
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 (~100000 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {EXECUTE LIST SUBQUERY 1} 
  1 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t2 (~1000000 rows)}
}
det 3.3.2 {
  SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE y IN (SELECT y FROM t2 WHERE t1.x!=t2.x)
} {
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 (~500000 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {EXECUTE CORRELATED LIST SUBQUERY 1} 
  1 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t2 (~500000 rows)}
}
det 3.3.3 {
  SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT y FROM t2 WHERE t1.x!=t2.x)
} {
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 (~500000 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {EXECUTE CORRELATED SCALAR SUBQUERY 1} 
  1 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t2 (~500000 rows)}
}

#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Test cases eqp-4.* - tests for composite select statements.
#
do_eqp_test 4.1.1 {
  SELECT * FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM t2
} {

#***********************************************************************
# This file implements regression tests for the FTS3 module. The focus
# of this file is tables created with the "matchinfo=fts3" option.
#

set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
source $testdir/tester.tcl




set testprefix fts3matchinfo

proc mit {blob} {
  set scan(littleEndian) i*
  set scan(bigEndian) I*
  binary scan $blob $scan($::tcl_platform(byteOrder)) r

#***********************************************************************
# This file implements regression tests for the FTS3 module. The focus
# of this file is tables created with the "matchinfo=fts3" option.
#

set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
source $testdir/tester.tcl

# If SQLITE_ENABLE_FTS3 is not defined, omit this file.
ifcapable !fts3 { finish_test ; return }

set testprefix fts3matchinfo

proc mit {blob} {
  set scan(littleEndian) i*
  set scan(bigEndian) I*
  binary scan $blob $scan($::tcl_platform(byteOrder)) r

#
proc EQP {sql} {
  uplevel "execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN $sql}"
}

# These tests are to check that "EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN" is working as expected.
#
do_test indexedby-1.2 {
  EQP { select * from t1 WHERE a = 10; }
} {0 0 {TABLE t1 WITH INDEX i1}}
do_test indexedby-1.3 {
  EQP { select * from t1 ; }
} {0 0 {TABLE t1}}
do_test indexedby-1.4 {
  EQP { select * from t1, t2 WHERE c = 10; }
} {0 1 {TABLE t2 WITH INDEX i3} 1 0 {TABLE t1}}




# Parser tests. Test that an INDEXED BY or NOT INDEX clause can be 
# attached to a table in the FROM clause, but not to a sub-select or
# SQL view. Also test that specifying an index that does not exist or
# is attached to a different table is detected as an error.
# 
do_test indexedby-2.1 {
................................................................................
} {1 {near "WHERE": syntax error}}
do_test indexedby-2.7 {
  catchsql { SELECT * FROM v1 INDEXED BY i1 WHERE a = 'one' }
} {1 {no such index: i1}}

# Tests for single table cases.
#
do_test indexedby-3.1 {
  EQP { SELECT * FROM t1 NOT INDEXED WHERE a = 'one' AND b = 'two'}
} {0 0 {TABLE t1}}
do_test indexedby-3.2 {

  EQP { SELECT * FROM t1 INDEXED BY i1 WHERE a = 'one' AND b = 'two'}
} {0 0 {TABLE t1 WITH INDEX i1}}

do_test indexedby-3.3 {

  EQP { SELECT * FROM t1 INDEXED BY i2 WHERE a = 'one' AND b = 'two'}
} {0 0 {TABLE t1 WITH INDEX i2}}

do_test indexedby-3.4 {
  catchsql { SELECT * FROM t1 INDEXED BY i2 WHERE a = 'one' }
} {1 {cannot use index: i2}}
do_test indexedby-3.5 {
  catchsql { SELECT * FROM t1 INDEXED BY i2 ORDER BY a }
} {1 {cannot use index: i2}}
do_test indexedby-3.6 {
  catchsql { SELECT * FROM t1 INDEXED BY i1 WHERE a = 'one' }
} {0 {}}
do_test indexedby-3.7 {
  catchsql { SELECT * FROM t1 INDEXED BY i1 ORDER BY a }
} {0 {}}

do_test indexedby-3.8 {

  EQP { SELECT * FROM t3 INDEXED BY sqlite_autoindex_t3_1 ORDER BY e }
} {0 0 {TABLE t3 WITH INDEX sqlite_autoindex_t3_1 ORDER BY}}
do_test indexedby-3.9 {

  EQP { SELECT * FROM t3 INDEXED BY sqlite_autoindex_t3_1 WHERE e = 10 }
} {0 0 {TABLE t3 WITH INDEX sqlite_autoindex_t3_1}}
do_test indexedby-3.10 {
  catchsql { SELECT * FROM t3 INDEXED BY sqlite_autoindex_t3_1 WHERE f = 10 }
} {1 {cannot use index: sqlite_autoindex_t3_1}}
do_test indexedby-3.11 {
  catchsql { SELECT * FROM t3 INDEXED BY sqlite_autoindex_t3_2 WHERE f = 10 }
} {1 {no such index: sqlite_autoindex_t3_2}}

# Tests for multiple table cases.
#
do_test indexedby-4.1 {
  EQP { SELECT * FROM t1, t2 WHERE a = c }
} {0 0 {TABLE t1} 1 1 {TABLE t2 WITH INDEX i3}}



do_test indexedby-4.2 {
  EQP { SELECT * FROM t1 INDEXED BY i1, t2 WHERE a = c }
} {0 1 {TABLE t2} 1 0 {TABLE t1 WITH INDEX i1}}




do_test indexedby-4.3 {
  catchsql {
    SELECT * FROM t1 INDEXED BY i1, t2 INDEXED BY i3 WHERE a=c
  }
} {1 {cannot use index: i1}}
do_test indexedby-4.4 {
  catchsql {
................................................................................
  }
} {1 {cannot use index: i3}}

# Test embedding an INDEXED BY in a CREATE VIEW statement. This block
# also tests that nothing bad happens if an index refered to by
# a CREATE VIEW statement is dropped and recreated.
#
do_test indexedby-5.1 {
  execsql {
    CREATE VIEW v2 AS SELECT * FROM t1 INDEXED BY i1 WHERE a > 5;
  }
  EQP { SELECT * FROM v2 }
} {0 0 {TABLE t1 WITH INDEX i1}}

do_test indexedby-5.2 {
  EQP { SELECT * FROM v2 WHERE b = 10 }
} {0 0 {TABLE t1 WITH INDEX i1}}

do_test indexedby-5.3 {
  execsql { DROP INDEX i1 }
  catchsql { SELECT * FROM v2 }
} {1 {no such index: i1}}
do_test indexedby-5.4 {
  # Recreate index i1 in such a way as it cannot be used by the view query.
  execsql { CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(b) }
................................................................................
  # be used by the query.
  execsql { DROP INDEX i1 ; CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a) }
  catchsql { SELECT * FROM v2 }
} {0 {}}

# Test that "NOT INDEXED" may use the rowid index, but not others.
# 
do_test indexedby-6.1 {
  EQP { SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b = 10 ORDER BY rowid }
} {0 0 {TABLE t1 WITH INDEX i2 ORDER BY}}
do_test indexedby-6.2 {
  EQP { SELECT * FROM t1 NOT INDEXED WHERE b = 10 ORDER BY rowid }
} {0 0 {TABLE t1 USING PRIMARY KEY ORDER BY}}

# Test that "INDEXED BY" can be used in a DELETE statement.
# 
do_test indexedby-7.1 {
  EQP { DELETE FROM t1 WHERE a = 5 }
} {0 0 {TABLE t1 WITH INDEX i1}}
do_test indexedby-7.2 {
  EQP { DELETE FROM t1 NOT INDEXED WHERE a = 5 }
} {0 0 {TABLE t1}}
do_test indexedby-7.3 {
  EQP { DELETE FROM t1 INDEXED BY i1 WHERE a = 5 }
} {0 0 {TABLE t1 WITH INDEX i1}}
do_test indexedby-7.4 {
  EQP { DELETE FROM t1 INDEXED BY i1 WHERE a = 5 AND b = 10}
} {0 0 {TABLE t1 WITH INDEX i1}}
do_test indexedby-7.5 {
  EQP { DELETE FROM t1 INDEXED BY i2 WHERE a = 5 AND b = 10}
} {0 0 {TABLE t1 WITH INDEX i2}}
do_test indexedby-7.6 {
  catchsql { DELETE FROM t1 INDEXED BY i2 WHERE a = 5}
} {1 {cannot use index: i2}}

# Test that "INDEXED BY" can be used in an UPDATE statement.
# 
do_test indexedby-8.1 {
  EQP { UPDATE t1 SET rowid=rowid+1 WHERE a = 5 }
} {0 0 {TABLE t1 WITH INDEX i1}}
do_test indexedby-8.2 {
  EQP { UPDATE t1 NOT INDEXED SET rowid=rowid+1 WHERE a = 5 }
} {0 0 {TABLE t1}}
do_test indexedby-8.3 {
  EQP { UPDATE t1 INDEXED BY i1 SET rowid=rowid+1 WHERE a = 5 }
} {0 0 {TABLE t1 WITH INDEX i1}}
do_test indexedby-8.4 {

  EQP { UPDATE t1 INDEXED BY i1 SET rowid=rowid+1 WHERE a = 5 AND b = 10}
} {0 0 {TABLE t1 WITH INDEX i1}}

do_test indexedby-8.5 {

  EQP { UPDATE t1 INDEXED BY i2 SET rowid=rowid+1 WHERE a = 5 AND b = 10}
} {0 0 {TABLE t1 WITH INDEX i2}}

do_test indexedby-8.6 {
  catchsql { UPDATE t1 INDEXED BY i2 SET rowid=rowid+1 WHERE a = 5}
} {1 {cannot use index: i2}}

# Test that bug #3560 is fixed.
#
do_test indexedby-9.1 {

#
proc EQP {sql} {
  uplevel "execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN $sql}"
}

# These tests are to check that "EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN" is working as expected.
#
do_execsql_test indexedby-1.2 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN select * from t1 WHERE a = 10; 
} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY INDEX i1 (a=?) (~10 rows)}}
do_execsql_test indexedby-1.3 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN select * from t1 ; 
} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 (~1000000 rows)}}
do_execsql_test indexedby-1.4 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN select * from t1, t2 WHERE c = 10; 
} {
  0 0 1 {SCAN TABLE t2 BY INDEX i3 (c=?) (~10 rows)} 
  0 1 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 (~1000000 rows)}
}

# Parser tests. Test that an INDEXED BY or NOT INDEX clause can be 
# attached to a table in the FROM clause, but not to a sub-select or
# SQL view. Also test that specifying an index that does not exist or
# is attached to a different table is detected as an error.
# 
do_test indexedby-2.1 {
................................................................................
} {1 {near "WHERE": syntax error}}
do_test indexedby-2.7 {
  catchsql { SELECT * FROM v1 INDEXED BY i1 WHERE a = 'one' }
} {1 {no such index: i1}}

# Tests for single table cases.
#
do_execsql_test indexedby-3.1 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 NOT INDEXED WHERE a = 'one' AND b = 'two'
} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 (~10000 rows)}}
do_execsql_test indexedby-3.2 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN 
  SELECT * FROM t1 INDEXED BY i1 WHERE a = 'one' AND b = 'two'

} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY INDEX i1 (a=?) (~2 rows)}}
do_execsql_test indexedby-3.3 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN 
  SELECT * FROM t1 INDEXED BY i2 WHERE a = 'one' AND b = 'two'

} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY INDEX i2 (b=?) (~2 rows)}}
do_test indexedby-3.4 {
  catchsql { SELECT * FROM t1 INDEXED BY i2 WHERE a = 'one' }
} {1 {cannot use index: i2}}
do_test indexedby-3.5 {
  catchsql { SELECT * FROM t1 INDEXED BY i2 ORDER BY a }
} {1 {cannot use index: i2}}
do_test indexedby-3.6 {
  catchsql { SELECT * FROM t1 INDEXED BY i1 WHERE a = 'one' }
} {0 {}}
do_test indexedby-3.7 {
  catchsql { SELECT * FROM t1 INDEXED BY i1 ORDER BY a }
} {0 {}}

do_execsql_test indexedby-3.8 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN 
  SELECT * FROM t3 INDEXED BY sqlite_autoindex_t3_1 ORDER BY e 
} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t3 BY INDEX sqlite_autoindex_t3_1 (~1000000 rows)}}
do_execsql_test indexedby-3.9 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN 
  SELECT * FROM t3 INDEXED BY sqlite_autoindex_t3_1 WHERE e = 10 
} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t3 BY INDEX sqlite_autoindex_t3_1 (e=?) (~1 rows)}}
do_test indexedby-3.10 {
  catchsql { SELECT * FROM t3 INDEXED BY sqlite_autoindex_t3_1 WHERE f = 10 }
} {1 {cannot use index: sqlite_autoindex_t3_1}}
do_test indexedby-3.11 {
  catchsql { SELECT * FROM t3 INDEXED BY sqlite_autoindex_t3_2 WHERE f = 10 }
} {1 {no such index: sqlite_autoindex_t3_2}}

# Tests for multiple table cases.
#
do_execsql_test indexedby-4.1 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1, t2 WHERE a = c 
} {
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 (~1000000 rows)} 
  0 1 1 {SCAN TABLE t2 BY INDEX i3 (c=?) (~10 rows)}
}
do_execsql_test indexedby-4.2 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 INDEXED BY i1, t2 WHERE a = c 

} {
  0 0 1 {SCAN TABLE t2 (~1000000 rows)} 
  0 1 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY INDEX i1 (a=?) (~10 rows)}
}
do_test indexedby-4.3 {
  catchsql {
    SELECT * FROM t1 INDEXED BY i1, t2 INDEXED BY i3 WHERE a=c
  }
} {1 {cannot use index: i1}}
do_test indexedby-4.4 {
  catchsql {
................................................................................
  }
} {1 {cannot use index: i3}}

# Test embedding an INDEXED BY in a CREATE VIEW statement. This block
# also tests that nothing bad happens if an index refered to by
# a CREATE VIEW statement is dropped and recreated.
#
do_execsql_test indexedby-5.1 {

  CREATE VIEW v2 AS SELECT * FROM t1 INDEXED BY i1 WHERE a > 5;

  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM v2 

} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY INDEX i1 (a>?) (~330000 rows)}}
do_execsql_test indexedby-5.2 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM v2 WHERE b = 10 

} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY INDEX i1 (a>?) (~33000 rows)}}
do_test indexedby-5.3 {
  execsql { DROP INDEX i1 }
  catchsql { SELECT * FROM v2 }
} {1 {no such index: i1}}
do_test indexedby-5.4 {
  # Recreate index i1 in such a way as it cannot be used by the view query.
  execsql { CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(b) }
................................................................................
  # be used by the query.
  execsql { DROP INDEX i1 ; CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a) }
  catchsql { SELECT * FROM v2 }
} {0 {}}

# Test that "NOT INDEXED" may use the rowid index, but not others.
# 
do_execsql_test indexedby-6.1 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b = 10 ORDER BY rowid 
} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY INDEX i2 (b=?) (~10 rows)}}
do_execsql_test indexedby-6.2 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 NOT INDEXED WHERE b = 10 ORDER BY rowid 
} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY INTEGER PRIMARY KEY (~100000 rows)}}

# Test that "INDEXED BY" can be used in a DELETE statement.
# 
do_execsql_test indexedby-7.1 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN DELETE FROM t1 WHERE a = 5 
} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY COVERING INDEX i1 (a=?) (~10 rows)}}
do_execsql_test indexedby-7.2 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN DELETE FROM t1 NOT INDEXED WHERE a = 5 
} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 (~100000 rows)}}
do_execsql_test indexedby-7.3 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN DELETE FROM t1 INDEXED BY i1 WHERE a = 5 
} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY COVERING INDEX i1 (a=?) (~10 rows)}}
do_execsql_test indexedby-7.4 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN DELETE FROM t1 INDEXED BY i1 WHERE a = 5 AND b = 10
} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY INDEX i1 (a=?) (~2 rows)}}
do_execsql_test indexedby-7.5 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN DELETE FROM t1 INDEXED BY i2 WHERE a = 5 AND b = 10
} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY INDEX i2 (b=?) (~2 rows)}}
do_test indexedby-7.6 {
  catchsql { DELETE FROM t1 INDEXED BY i2 WHERE a = 5}
} {1 {cannot use index: i2}}

# Test that "INDEXED BY" can be used in an UPDATE statement.
# 
do_execsql_test indexedby-8.1 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN UPDATE t1 SET rowid=rowid+1 WHERE a = 5 
} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY COVERING INDEX i1 (a=?) (~10 rows)}}
do_execsql_test indexedby-8.2 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN UPDATE t1 NOT INDEXED SET rowid=rowid+1 WHERE a = 5 
} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 (~100000 rows)}}
do_execsql_test indexedby-8.3 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN UPDATE t1 INDEXED BY i1 SET rowid=rowid+1 WHERE a = 5 
} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY COVERING INDEX i1 (a=?) (~10 rows)}}
do_execsql_test indexedby-8.4 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN 
  UPDATE t1 INDEXED BY i1 SET rowid=rowid+1 WHERE a = 5 AND b = 10

} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY INDEX i1 (a=?) (~2 rows)}}
do_execsql_test indexedby-8.5 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN 
  UPDATE t1 INDEXED BY i2 SET rowid=rowid+1 WHERE a = 5 AND b = 10

} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY INDEX i2 (b=?) (~2 rows)}}
do_test indexedby-8.6 {
  catchsql { UPDATE t1 INDEXED BY i2 SET rowid=rowid+1 WHERE a = 5}
} {1 {cannot use index: i2}}

# Test that bug #3560 is fixed.
#
do_test indexedby-9.1 {

  } {
    set testname "${::testprefix}-$testname"
  }
}
    
proc do_execsql_test {testname sql {result {}}} {
  fix_testname testname
  uplevel do_test $testname [list "execsql {$sql}"] [list $result]
}
proc do_catchsql_test {testname sql result} {
  fix_testname testname
  uplevel do_test $testname [list "catchsql {$sql}"] [list $result]
}

#-------------------------------------------------------------------------

  } {
    set testname "${::testprefix}-$testname"
  }
}
    
proc do_execsql_test {testname sql {result {}}} {
  fix_testname testname
  uplevel do_test $testname [list "execsql {$sql}"] [list [list {*}$result]]
}
proc do_catchsql_test {testname sql result} {
  fix_testname testname
  uplevel do_test $testname [list "catchsql {$sql}"] [list $result]
}

#-------------------------------------------------------------------------

    CREATE INDEX i1 ON ""("" COLLATE nocase);
  }
} {}
do_test tkt-78e04-1.4 {
  execsql {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM "" WHERE "" LIKE 'abc%';
  }
} {0 0 {TABLE }}
do_test tkt-78e04-1.5 {
  execsql {
    DROP TABLE "";
    SELECT name FROM sqlite_master;
  }
} {t2}

do_test tkt-78e04-2.1 {
  execsql {
    CREATE INDEX "" ON t2(x);
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE x=5;
  }
} {0 0 {TABLE t2 WITH INDEX }}
do_test tkt-78e04-2.2 {
  execsql {
    DROP INDEX "";
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE x=2;
  }
} {0 0 {TABLE t2}}

finish_test

    CREATE INDEX i1 ON ""("" COLLATE nocase);
  }
} {}
do_test tkt-78e04-1.4 {
  execsql {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM "" WHERE "" LIKE 'abc%';
  }
} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE  (~500000 rows)}}
do_test tkt-78e04-1.5 {
  execsql {
    DROP TABLE "";
    SELECT name FROM sqlite_master;
  }
} {t2}

do_test tkt-78e04-2.1 {
  execsql {
    CREATE INDEX "" ON t2(x);
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE x=5;
  }
} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t2 BY COVERING INDEX  (x=?) (~10 rows)}}
do_test tkt-78e04-2.2 {
  execsql {
    DROP INDEX "";
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE x=2;
  }
} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t2 (~100000 rows)}}

finish_test

# These tests perform an EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN on both versions of the 
# SELECT referenced in ticket #3442 (both '5000' and "5000") 
# and verify that the query plan is the same.
#
ifcapable explain {
  do_test tkt3442-1.2 {
    EQP { SELECT node FROM listhash WHERE id='5000' LIMIT 1; }
  } {0 0 {TABLE listhash WITH INDEX ididx}}
  do_test tkt3442-1.3 {
    EQP { SELECT node FROM listhash WHERE id="5000" LIMIT 1; }
  } {0 0 {TABLE listhash WITH INDEX ididx}}
}


# Some extra tests testing other permutations of 5000.
#
ifcapable explain {
  do_test tkt3442-1.4 {
    EQP { SELECT node FROM listhash WHERE id=5000 LIMIT 1; }
  } {0 0 {TABLE listhash WITH INDEX ididx}}
}
do_test tkt3442-1.5 {
  catchsql {
    SELECT node FROM listhash WHERE id=[5000] LIMIT 1;
  }
} {1 {no such column: 5000}}

finish_test

# These tests perform an EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN on both versions of the 
# SELECT referenced in ticket #3442 (both '5000' and "5000") 
# and verify that the query plan is the same.
#
ifcapable explain {
  do_test tkt3442-1.2 {
    EQP { SELECT node FROM listhash WHERE id='5000' LIMIT 1; }
  } {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE listhash BY INDEX ididx (id=?) (~1 rows)}}
  do_test tkt3442-1.3 {
    EQP { SELECT node FROM listhash WHERE id="5000" LIMIT 1; }
  } {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE listhash BY INDEX ididx (id=?) (~1 rows)}}
}


# Some extra tests testing other permutations of 5000.
#
ifcapable explain {
  do_test tkt3442-1.4 {
    EQP { SELECT node FROM listhash WHERE id=5000 LIMIT 1; }
  } {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE listhash BY INDEX ididx (id=?) (~1 rows)}}
}
do_test tkt3442-1.5 {
  catchsql {
    SELECT node FROM listhash WHERE id=[5000] LIMIT 1;
  }
} {1 {no such column: 5000}}

finish_test

} {tB {} tC * tA * tD *}

# Ticket [13f033c865f878953]
# If the outer loop must be a full table scan, do not let ANALYZE trick
# the planner into use a table for the outer loop that might be indexable
# if held until an inner loop.
# 
do_test where3-3.0 {
  execsql {
    CREATE TABLE t301(a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,b,c);
    CREATE INDEX t301c ON t301(c);
    INSERT INTO t301 VALUES(1,2,3);
    CREATE TABLE t302(x, y);
    ANALYZE;
    explain query plan
    SELECT * FROM t302, t301 WHERE t302.x=5 AND t301.a=t302.y;



  }
} {0 0 {TABLE t302} 1 1 {TABLE t301 USING PRIMARY KEY}}
do_test where3-3.1 {
  execsql {
    explain query plan
    SELECT * FROM t301, t302 WHERE t302.x=5 AND t301.a=t302.y;



  }
} {0 1 {TABLE t302} 1 0 {TABLE t301 USING PRIMARY KEY}}

# Verify that when there are multiple tables in a join which must be
# full table scans that the query planner attempts put the table with
# the fewest number of output rows as the outer loop.
#
do_test where3-4.0 {
  execsql {
    CREATE TABLE t400(a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, b, c);
    CREATE TABLE t401(p INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, q, r);
    CREATE TABLE t402(x INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, y, z);
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT * FROM t400, t401, t402 WHERE t402.z GLOB 'abc*';




  }
} {0 2 {TABLE t402} 1 0 {TABLE t400} 2 1 {TABLE t401}}
do_test where3-4.1 {
  execsql {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT * FROM t400, t401, t402 WHERE t401.r GLOB 'abc*';




  }
} {0 1 {TABLE t401} 1 0 {TABLE t400} 2 2 {TABLE t402}}
do_test where3-4.2 {
  execsql {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT * FROM t400, t401, t402 WHERE t400.c GLOB 'abc*';




  }
} {0 0 {TABLE t400} 1 1 {TABLE t401} 2 2 {TABLE t402}}

# Verify that a performance regression encountered by firefox
# has been fixed.
#
do_test where3-5.0 {
  execsql {
     CREATE TABLE aaa (id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, type INTEGER,
                       fk INTEGER DEFAULT NULL, parent INTEGER,
                       position INTEGER, title LONGVARCHAR,
                       keyword_id INTEGER, folder_type TEXT,
                       dateAdded INTEGER, lastModified INTEGER);
     CREATE INDEX aaa_111 ON aaa (fk, type);
     CREATE INDEX aaa_222 ON aaa (parent, position);
     CREATE INDEX aaa_333 ON aaa (fk, lastModified);
     CREATE TABLE bbb (id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, type INTEGER,
                       fk INTEGER DEFAULT NULL, parent INTEGER,
                       position INTEGER, title LONGVARCHAR,
                       keyword_id INTEGER, folder_type TEXT,
                       dateAdded INTEGER, lastModified INTEGER);
     CREATE INDEX bbb_111 ON bbb (fk, type);
     CREATE INDEX bbb_222 ON bbb (parent, position);
     CREATE INDEX bbb_333 ON bbb (fk, lastModified);
  }

  execsql {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
     SELECT bbb.title AS tag_title 
       FROM aaa JOIN bbb ON bbb.id = aaa.parent  
      WHERE aaa.fk = 'constant'
        AND LENGTH(bbb.title) > 0
        AND bbb.parent = 4
      ORDER BY bbb.title COLLATE NOCASE ASC;




  }
} {0 0 {TABLE aaa WITH INDEX aaa_333} 1 1 {TABLE bbb USING PRIMARY KEY}}
do_test where3-5.1 {
  execsql {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
     SELECT bbb.title AS tag_title 
       FROM aaa JOIN aaa AS bbb ON bbb.id = aaa.parent  
      WHERE aaa.fk = 'constant'
        AND LENGTH(bbb.title) > 0
        AND bbb.parent = 4
      ORDER BY bbb.title COLLATE NOCASE ASC;




  }
} {0 0 {TABLE aaa WITH INDEX aaa_333} 1 1 {TABLE aaa AS bbb USING PRIMARY KEY}}
do_test where3-5.2 {
  execsql {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
     SELECT bbb.title AS tag_title 
       FROM bbb JOIN aaa ON bbb.id = aaa.parent  
      WHERE aaa.fk = 'constant'
        AND LENGTH(bbb.title) > 0
        AND bbb.parent = 4
      ORDER BY bbb.title COLLATE NOCASE ASC;




  }
} {0 1 {TABLE aaa WITH INDEX aaa_333} 1 0 {TABLE bbb USING PRIMARY KEY}}
do_test where3-5.3 {
  execsql {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
     SELECT bbb.title AS tag_title 
       FROM aaa AS bbb JOIN aaa ON bbb.id = aaa.parent  
      WHERE aaa.fk = 'constant'
        AND LENGTH(bbb.title) > 0
        AND bbb.parent = 4
      ORDER BY bbb.title COLLATE NOCASE ASC;




  }
} {0 1 {TABLE aaa WITH INDEX aaa_333} 1 0 {TABLE aaa AS bbb USING PRIMARY KEY}}


finish_test

} {tB {} tC * tA * tD *}

# Ticket [13f033c865f878953]
# If the outer loop must be a full table scan, do not let ANALYZE trick
# the planner into use a table for the outer loop that might be indexable
# if held until an inner loop.
# 
do_execsql_test where3-3.0 {

  CREATE TABLE t301(a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,b,c);
  CREATE INDEX t301c ON t301(c);
  INSERT INTO t301 VALUES(1,2,3);
  CREATE TABLE t302(x, y);
  ANALYZE;

  explain query plan SELECT * FROM t302, t301 WHERE t302.x=5 AND t301.a=t302.y;
} {
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t302 (~0 rows)} 
  0 1 1 {SCAN TABLE t301 BY INTEGER PRIMARY KEY (rowid=?) (~1 rows)}
}

do_execsql_test where3-3.1 {

  explain query plan
  SELECT * FROM t301, t302 WHERE t302.x=5 AND t301.a=t302.y;
} {
  0 0 1 {SCAN TABLE t302 (~0 rows)} 
  0 1 0 {SCAN TABLE t301 BY INTEGER PRIMARY KEY (rowid=?) (~1 rows)}
}


# Verify that when there are multiple tables in a join which must be
# full table scans that the query planner attempts put the table with
# the fewest number of output rows as the outer loop.
#
do_execsql_test where3-4.0 {

  CREATE TABLE t400(a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, b, c);
  CREATE TABLE t401(p INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, q, r);
  CREATE TABLE t402(x INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, y, z);
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
  SELECT * FROM t400, t401, t402 WHERE t402.z GLOB 'abc*';
} {
  0 0 2 {SCAN TABLE t402 (~500000 rows)} 
  0 1 0 {SCAN TABLE t400 (~1000000 rows)} 
  0 2 1 {SCAN TABLE t401 (~1000000 rows)}
}

do_execsql_test where3-4.1 {

  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
  SELECT * FROM t400, t401, t402 WHERE t401.r GLOB 'abc*';
} {
  0 0 1 {SCAN TABLE t401 (~500000 rows)} 
  0 1 0 {SCAN TABLE t400 (~1000000 rows)} 
  0 2 2 {SCAN TABLE t402 (~1000000 rows)}
}

do_execsql_test where3-4.2 {

  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
  SELECT * FROM t400, t401, t402 WHERE t400.c GLOB 'abc*';
} {
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t400 (~500000 rows)} 
  0 1 1 {SCAN TABLE t401 (~1000000 rows)} 
  0 2 2 {SCAN TABLE t402 (~1000000 rows)}
}


# Verify that a performance regression encountered by firefox
# has been fixed.
#
do_execsql_test where3-5.0 {

  CREATE TABLE aaa (id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, type INTEGER,
                    fk INTEGER DEFAULT NULL, parent INTEGER,
                    position INTEGER, title LONGVARCHAR,
                    keyword_id INTEGER, folder_type TEXT,
                    dateAdded INTEGER, lastModified INTEGER);
  CREATE INDEX aaa_111 ON aaa (fk, type);
  CREATE INDEX aaa_222 ON aaa (parent, position);
  CREATE INDEX aaa_333 ON aaa (fk, lastModified);
  CREATE TABLE bbb (id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, type INTEGER,
                    fk INTEGER DEFAULT NULL, parent INTEGER,
                    position INTEGER, title LONGVARCHAR,
                    keyword_id INTEGER, folder_type TEXT,
                    dateAdded INTEGER, lastModified INTEGER);
  CREATE INDEX bbb_111 ON bbb (fk, type);
  CREATE INDEX bbb_222 ON bbb (parent, position);
  CREATE INDEX bbb_333 ON bbb (fk, lastModified);



  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
   SELECT bbb.title AS tag_title 
     FROM aaa JOIN bbb ON bbb.id = aaa.parent  
    WHERE aaa.fk = 'constant'
      AND LENGTH(bbb.title) > 0
      AND bbb.parent = 4
    ORDER BY bbb.title COLLATE NOCASE ASC;
} {
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE aaa BY INDEX aaa_333 (fk=?) (~10 rows)} 
  0 1 1 {SCAN TABLE bbb BY INTEGER PRIMARY KEY (rowid=?) (~1 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {USE TEMP B-TREE FOR ORDER BY}
}

do_execsql_test where3-5.1 {

  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
   SELECT bbb.title AS tag_title 
     FROM aaa JOIN aaa AS bbb ON bbb.id = aaa.parent  
    WHERE aaa.fk = 'constant'
      AND LENGTH(bbb.title) > 0
      AND bbb.parent = 4
    ORDER BY bbb.title COLLATE NOCASE ASC;
} {
  0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE aaa BY INDEX aaa_333 (fk=?) (~10 rows)} 
  0 1 1 {SCAN TABLE aaa AS bbb BY INTEGER PRIMARY KEY (rowid=?) (~1 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {USE TEMP B-TREE FOR ORDER BY}
}

do_execsql_test where3-5.2 {

  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
   SELECT bbb.title AS tag_title 
     FROM bbb JOIN aaa ON bbb.id = aaa.parent  
    WHERE aaa.fk = 'constant'
      AND LENGTH(bbb.title) > 0
      AND bbb.parent = 4
    ORDER BY bbb.title COLLATE NOCASE ASC;
} {
  0 0 1 {SCAN TABLE aaa BY INDEX aaa_333 (fk=?) (~10 rows)} 
  0 1 0 {SCAN TABLE bbb BY INTEGER PRIMARY KEY (rowid=?) (~1 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {USE TEMP B-TREE FOR ORDER BY}
}

do_execsql_test where3-5.3 {

  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
   SELECT bbb.title AS tag_title 
     FROM aaa AS bbb JOIN aaa ON bbb.id = aaa.parent  
    WHERE aaa.fk = 'constant'
      AND LENGTH(bbb.title) > 0
      AND bbb.parent = 4
    ORDER BY bbb.title COLLATE NOCASE ASC;
} {
  0 0 1 {SCAN TABLE aaa BY INDEX aaa_333 (fk=?) (~10 rows)} 
  0 1 0 {SCAN TABLE aaa AS bbb BY INTEGER PRIMARY KEY (rowid=?) (~1 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {USE TEMP B-TREE FOR ORDER BY}
}



finish_test

# test case for the performance regression fixed by
# check-in 28ba6255282b on 2010-10-21 02:05:06
#
# The test case that follows is code from an actual
# application with identifiers change and unused columns
# remove.
#
do_test where7-3.1 {
  db eval {
    CREATE TABLE t301 (
        c8 INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
        c6 INTEGER,
        c4 INTEGER,
        c7 INTEGER,
        FOREIGN KEY (c4) REFERENCES series(c4)
    );
    CREATE INDEX t301_c6 on t301(c6);
    CREATE INDEX t301_c4 on t301(c4);
    CREATE INDEX t301_c7 on t301(c7);
    
    CREATE TABLE t302 (
        c1 INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
        c8 INTEGER,
        c5 INTEGER,
        c3 INTEGER,
        c2 INTEGER,
        c4 INTEGER,
        FOREIGN KEY (c8) REFERENCES t301(c8)
    );
    CREATE INDEX t302_c3 on t302(c3);
    CREATE INDEX t302_c8_c3 on t302(c8, c3);
    CREATE INDEX t302_c5 on t302(c5);
    
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT t302.c1 
      FROM t302 JOIN t301 ON t302.c8 = t301.c8
      WHERE t302.c2 = 19571
        AND t302.c3 > 1287603136
        AND (t301.c4 = 1407449685622784
             OR t301.c8 = 1407424651264000)
     ORDER BY t302.c5 LIMIT 200;





  }
} {0 1 {TABLE t301 VIA MULTI-INDEX UNION} 1 0 {TABLE t302 WITH INDEX t302_c8_c3} 0 0 {TABLE t301 WITH INDEX t301_c4} 0 0 {TABLE t301 USING PRIMARY KEY}}

finish_test

# test case for the performance regression fixed by
# check-in 28ba6255282b on 2010-10-21 02:05:06
#
# The test case that follows is code from an actual
# application with identifiers change and unused columns
# remove.
#
do_execsql_test where7-3.1 {

  CREATE TABLE t301 (
      c8 INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
      c6 INTEGER,
      c4 INTEGER,
      c7 INTEGER,
      FOREIGN KEY (c4) REFERENCES series(c4)
  );
  CREATE INDEX t301_c6 on t301(c6);
  CREATE INDEX t301_c4 on t301(c4);
  CREATE INDEX t301_c7 on t301(c7);
  
  CREATE TABLE t302 (
      c1 INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
      c8 INTEGER,
      c5 INTEGER,
      c3 INTEGER,
      c2 INTEGER,
      c4 INTEGER,
      FOREIGN KEY (c8) REFERENCES t301(c8)
  );
  CREATE INDEX t302_c3 on t302(c3);
  CREATE INDEX t302_c8_c3 on t302(c8, c3);
  CREATE INDEX t302_c5 on t302(c5);
  
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
  SELECT t302.c1 
    FROM t302 JOIN t301 ON t302.c8 = t301.c8
    WHERE t302.c2 = 19571
      AND t302.c3 > 1287603136
      AND (t301.c4 = 1407449685622784
           OR t301.c8 = 1407424651264000)
   ORDER BY t302.c5 LIMIT 200;
} {
  0 0 1 {SCAN TABLE t301 BY COVERING INDEX t301_c4 (c4=?) (~10 rows)} 
  0 0 1 {SCAN TABLE t301 BY INTEGER PRIMARY KEY (rowid=?) (~1 rows)} 
  0 1 0 {SCAN TABLE t302 BY INDEX t302_c8_c3 (c8=? AND c8>?) (~2 rows)} 
  0 0 0 {USE TEMP B-TREE FOR ORDER BY}
}


finish_test

     WHERE t1.a=t3.y OR t1.b=t3.y*11 OR (t1.c=27027 AND round(t1.d)==80)
    ORDER BY 1, 2, 3
  }
} {1 80 2 1 80 28 1 80 54 1 80 80 2 80 2 2 80 28 2 80 54 2 80 80 scan 1 sort 1}


ifcapable explain {
  do_test where9-3.1 {
    set r [db eval {
      EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
      SELECT t2.a FROM t1, t2
       WHERE t1.a=80
         AND ((t1.c=t2.c AND t1.d=t2.d) OR t1.f=t2.f)
    }]
    set a [expr {[lsearch $r {TABLE t2 VIA MULTI-INDEX UNION}]>=0}]
    set b [expr {[lsearch $r {TABLE t2 WITH INDEX t2f}]>=0}]
    set c [expr {([lsearch $r {TABLE t2 WITH INDEX t2c}]>=0)+
                  [lsearch $r {TABLE t2 WITH INDEX t2d}]>=0}]
    concat $a $b $c
  } {1 1 1}
  do_test where9-3.2 {
    set r [db eval {
      EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
      SELECT coalesce(t2.a,9999)
        FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 ON (t1.c+1=t2.c AND t1.d=t2.d) OR (t1.f||'x')=t2.f
       WHERE t1.a=80
    }]
    set a [expr {[lsearch $r {TABLE t2 VIA MULTI-INDEX UNION}]>=0}]
    set b [expr {[lsearch $r {TABLE t2 WITH INDEX t2f}]>=0}]
    set c [expr {([lsearch $r {TABLE t2 WITH INDEX t2c}]>=0)+
                  [lsearch $r {TABLE t2 WITH INDEX t2d}]>=0}]
    concat $a $b $c
  } {1 1 1}
} 

# Make sure that INDEXED BY and multi-index OR clauses play well with
# one another.
#
do_test where9-4.1 {
  count_steps {
................................................................................
  }
} {1 {cannot use index: t1d}}

ifcapable explain {
  # The (c=31031 OR d IS NULL) clause is preferred over b>1000 because
  # the former is an equality test which is expected to return fewer rows.
  #
  do_test where9-5.1 {
    set r [db eval {
      EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
      SELECT a FROM t1
       WHERE b>1000
         AND (c=31031 OR d IS NULL)
    }]
    set a [expr {[lsearch $r {TABLE t1 VIA MULTI-INDEX UNION}]>=0}]
    set b [expr {[lsearch $r {TABLE t1 WITH INDEX t1b}]>=0}]
    concat $a $b
  } {1 0}




  # In contrast, b=1000 is preferred over any OR-clause.
  #
  do_test where9-5.2 {
    set r [db eval {
      EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
      SELECT a FROM t1
       WHERE b=1000
         AND (c=31031 OR d IS NULL)
    }]
    set a [expr {[lsearch $r {TABLE t1 VIA MULTI-INDEX UNION}]>=0}]
    set b [expr {[lsearch $r {TABLE t1 WITH INDEX t1b}]>=0}]
    concat $a $b
  } {0 1}



  # Likewise, inequalities in an AND are preferred over inequalities in
  # an OR.
  #
  do_test where9-5.3 {
    set r [db eval {
      EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
      SELECT a FROM t1
       WHERE b>1000
         AND (c>=31031 OR d IS NULL)
    }]
    set a [expr {[lsearch $r {TABLE t1 VIA MULTI-INDEX UNION}]>=0}]
    set b [expr {[lsearch $r {TABLE t1 WITH INDEX t1b}]>=0}]
    concat $a $b
  } {0 1}


}

############################################################################
# Make sure OR-clauses work correctly on UPDATE and DELETE statements.

do_test where9-6.2.1 {
  db eval {SELECT count(*) FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE a>=85}

     WHERE t1.a=t3.y OR t1.b=t3.y*11 OR (t1.c=27027 AND round(t1.d)==80)
    ORDER BY 1, 2, 3
  }
} {1 80 2 1 80 28 1 80 54 1 80 80 2 80 2 2 80 28 2 80 54 2 80 80 scan 1 sort 1}


ifcapable explain {
  do_execsql_test where9-3.1 {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT t2.a FROM t1, t2
    WHERE t1.a=80 AND ((t1.c=t2.c AND t1.d=t2.d) OR t1.f=t2.f)
  } {
    0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY INTEGER PRIMARY KEY (rowid=?) (~1 rows)} 
    0 1 1 {SCAN TABLE t2 BY INDEX t2d (d=?) (~2 rows)} 
    0 1 1 {SCAN TABLE t2 BY COVERING INDEX t2f (f=?) (~10 rows)}
  }
  do_execsql_test where9-3.2 {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT coalesce(t2.a,9999)
    FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 ON (t1.c+1=t2.c AND t1.d=t2.d) OR (t1.f||'x')=t2.f
    WHERE t1.a=80
  } {
    0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY INTEGER PRIMARY KEY (rowid=?) (~1 rows)} 
    0 1 1 {SCAN TABLE t2 BY INDEX t2d (d=?) (~2 rows)} 
    0 1 1 {SCAN TABLE t2 BY COVERING INDEX t2f (f=?) (~10 rows)}
  }







} 

# Make sure that INDEXED BY and multi-index OR clauses play well with
# one another.
#
do_test where9-4.1 {
  count_steps {
................................................................................
  }
} {1 {cannot use index: t1d}}

ifcapable explain {
  # The (c=31031 OR d IS NULL) clause is preferred over b>1000 because
  # the former is an equality test which is expected to return fewer rows.
  #
  do_execsql_test where9-5.1 {




    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE b>1000 AND (c=31031 OR d IS NULL)




  } {
    0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY INDEX t1c (c=?) (~10 rows)} 
    0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY INDEX t1d (d=?) (~10 rows)}
  }

  # In contrast, b=1000 is preferred over any OR-clause.
  #
  do_execsql_test where9-5.2 {




    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE b=1000 AND (c=31031 OR d IS NULL)




  } {
    0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY INDEX t1b (b=?) (~5 rows)}
  }

  # Likewise, inequalities in an AND are preferred over inequalities in
  # an OR.
  #
  do_execsql_test where9-5.3 {




    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE b>1000 AND (c>=31031 OR d IS NULL)




  } {
    0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1 BY INDEX t1b (a>?) (~165000 rows)}
  }
}

############################################################################
# Make sure OR-clauses work correctly on UPDATE and DELETE statements.

do_test where9-6.2.1 {
  db eval {SELECT count(*) FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE a>=85}